
GRID M10-1B vs Radeon HD 4890

GRID M10-1B
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 4890
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GRID M10-1B is positioned at rank #377 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID M10-1B
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GRID M10-1B is significantly newer (2015 vs 2009). The GRID M10-1B likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 4890 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 4890 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.8% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID M10-1B.
| Insight | GRID M10-1B | Radeon HD 4890 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 4890 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 4890 holds the technical lead. Priced at $25 (vs $150), it costs 83% less, resulting in a 516.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID M10-1B | Radeon HD 4890 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+516.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) | ✅More affordable ($25) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID M10-1B and Radeon HD 4890

GRID M10-1B
The GRID M10-1B is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,504 points.

Radeon HD 4890
The Radeon HD 4890 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 2 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,546 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
The GRID M10-1B scores 1,504 and the Radeon HD 4890 reaches 1,546 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M10-1B is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon HD 4890 uses TeraScale, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M10-1B) vs 800 (Radeon HD 4890). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M10-1B) vs 1.36 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4890).
| Feature | GRID M10-1B | Radeon HD 4890 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,504 | 1,546+3% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | TeraScale |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+156% | 800 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS+255% | 1.36 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 128+220% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+380% | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID M10-1B | Radeon HD 4890 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID M10-1B comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 4890 has 2 GB. The Radeon HD 4890 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M10-1B) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 4890) — the GRID M10-1B has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID M10-1B | Radeon HD 4890 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 2 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID M10-1B draws 225W versus the Radeon HD 4890's 190W — a 16.9% difference. The Radeon HD 4890 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M10-1B) vs 500W (Radeon HD 4890). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin.
| Feature | GRID M10-1B | Radeon HD 4890 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 190W-16% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 6.7 | 8.1+21% |
Value Analysis
The GRID M10-1B launched at $2500 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the Radeon HD 4890 launched at $249 and now averages $25. The Radeon HD 4890 costs 83.3% less ($125 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 10.0 (GRID M10-1B) vs 61.8 (Radeon HD 4890) — the Radeon HD 4890 offers 518% better value. The GRID M10-1B is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2009).
| Feature | GRID M10-1B | Radeon HD 4890 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2500 | $249-90% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $25-83% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.0 | 61.8+518% |
| Codename | GM204 | RV790 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | April 2 2009 |
| Ranking | #525 | #762 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















