GRID M10-1B vs Radeon HD 4890

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID M10-1B vs Radeon HD 4890 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID M10-1B vs Radeon HD 4890: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID M10-1B

2015

Why buy it

✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
904% HIGHER MSRP
$2,500 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.6 vs 6.2 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
❌18.4% higher power demand at 225W vs 190W.

Radeon HD 4890

2009

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,251 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 932.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.2 vs 0.6 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 190W instead of 225W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2009 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 4890 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.8% in PassMark G3D (1,546 vs 1,504), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID M10-1B is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 55nm and a newer 2015 generation instead of 2009. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 4890 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,251 cheaper on MSRP at $249 vs $2,500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 932.1% (6.2 vs 0.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 4890 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GRID M10-1B has the stronger long-term case.

GRID M10-1B vs Radeon HD 4890 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID M10-1B

The GRID M10-1B is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,504 points.

Radeon HD 4890

The Radeon HD 4890 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 2 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,546 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID M10-1B scores 1,504 and the Radeon HD 4890 reaches 1,546 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M10-1B is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon HD 4890 uses TeraScale, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M10-1B) vs 800 (Radeon HD 4890). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M10-1B) vs 1.36 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4890).

Feature	GRID M10-1B	Radeon HD 4890
G3D Mark Score	1,504	1,546+3%
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	TeraScale
Process Node	28 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	2048+156%	800
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.825 TFLOPS+255%	1.36 TFLOPS
ROPs	64+300%	16
TMUs	128+220%	40
L1 Cache	768 KB+380%	160 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID M10-1B	Radeon HD 4890
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID M10-1B has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 4890 carries 2 GB. Radeon HD 4890 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID M10-1B and 64-bit on the Radeon HD 4890. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M10-1B) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 4890) — the GRID M10-1B has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID M10-1B	Radeon HD 4890
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	2 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID M10-1B draws 225W versus the Radeon HD 4890's 190W — a 16.9% difference. The Radeon HD 4890 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M10-1B) vs 500W (Radeon HD 4890). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin.

Feature	GRID M10-1B	Radeon HD 4890
TDP	225W	190W-16%
Recommended PSU	350W-30%	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	2x 6-pin
Length	1mm	—
Slots	0	—
Perf/Watt	6.7	8.1+21%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID M10-1B came in at $2500, while the Radeon HD 4890 launched at $249. On MSRP, Radeon HD 4890 was 90% cheaper ($2251 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.6 (GRID M10-1B) vs 6.2 (Radeon HD 4890) — the Radeon HD 4890 offers 933.3% better value. The newer card here is GRID M10-1B (2015 vs 2009).

Feature	GRID M10-1B	Radeon HD 4890
MSRP	$2500	$249-90%
Performance per Dollar	0.6	6.2+933%
Codename	GM204	RV790
Release	August 30 2015	April 2 2009
Ranking	#525	#762

Search GRID M10-1B on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 4890 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.