Intel UHD Graphics vs UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
Intel UHD Graphics
Popular choices:
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Intel UHD Graphics is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H).
| Insight | Intel UHD Graphics | UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) |
| Longevity | Generation 11.0 (2019−2021) (10nm) | Gen. 12 (2021−2023) (10nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Intel UHD Graphics remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Intel UHD Graphics and UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
Intel UHD Graphics
The Intel UHD Graphics is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 11 2021. It features the Generation 11.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 750 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 10 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,511 points.
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
The UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 11 2021. It features the Gen. 12 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 32 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,500 points.
Graphics Performance
The Intel UHD Graphics scores 1,511 and the UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) reaches 1,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel UHD Graphics is built on Generation 11.0 while the UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) uses Gen. 12, both on 10 nm+ vs 10 nm. Shader units: 256 (Intel UHD Graphics) vs 32 (UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)). Boost clocks: 750 MHz vs 1450 MHz.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics | UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,511 | 1,500 |
| Architecture | Generation 11.0 | Gen. 12 |
| Process Node | 10 nm+ | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 256+700% | 32 |
| Boost Clock | 750 MHz | 1450 MHz+93% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics | UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 0 MB of Shared. Bus width: System vs System.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics | UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | System |
| Bus Width | System | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel UHD Graphics draws 10W versus the UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)'s 15W — a 40% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel UHD Graphics) vs 1W (UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics | UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 10W-33% | 15W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W | 1W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | Integrated |
| Perf/Watt | 151.1+51% | 100.0 |
Value Analysis
The Intel UHD Graphics launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) launched at $0 and now averages $0. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics) vs Infinity (UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)) — the UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) offers NaN% better value.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics | UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | $0 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0 | $0 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | Infinity |
| Codename | Jasper Lake GT1 | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Release | January 11 2021 | May 11 2021 |
| Ranking | #666 | #709 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Intel UHD Graphics and UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
