Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs GeForce GTX 750
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 750
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is significantly newer (2020 vs 2014). The Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 750 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 750 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (2 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
| Insight | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | GeForce GTX 750 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0%) |
| Longevity | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) (10nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 750 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and GeForce GTX 750
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 96 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 28W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.
GeForce GTX 750
The GeForce GTX 750 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 18 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1020 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,312 points. Launch price was $119.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs scores 3,311 and the GeForce GTX 750 reaches 3,312 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is built on Gen. 11 Ice Lake while the GeForce GTX 750 uses Maxwell, both on 10 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 96 (Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs) vs 512 (GeForce GTX 750). Boost clocks: 1350 MHz vs 1085 MHz.
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | GeForce GTX 750 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,311 | 3,312 |
| Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 10 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 96 | 512+433% |
| Boost Clock | 1350 MHz+24% | 1085 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | GeForce GTX 750 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 750 has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 750 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | GeForce GTX 750 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 80 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs) vs 12_0 (GeForce GTX 750). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | GeForce GTX 750 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs) vs NVENC 3rd Gen (GeForce GTX 750). Decoder: QuickSync vs NVDEC 1st Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs) vs H.264 (GeForce GTX 750).
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | GeForce GTX 750 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | QuickSync | NVENC 3rd Gen |
| Decoder | QuickSync | NVDEC 1st Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 | H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs draws 28W versus the GeForce GTX 750's 55W — a 65.1% difference. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 750). Power connectors: Integrated vs None.
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | GeForce GTX 750 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 28W-49% | 55W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 300W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | None |
| Length | — | 145mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 118.3+97% | 60.2 |
Value Analysis
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the GeForce GTX 750 launched at $120 and now averages $35. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs costs 100+% less ($35 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs) vs 94.6 (GeForce GTX 750) — the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs offers Infinity% better value. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2014).
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | GeForce GTX 750 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $120 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $35 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 94.6 |
| Codename | Tiger Lake Xe | GM107 |
| Release | August 15 2020 | February 18 2014 |
| Ranking | #536 | #559 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and GeForce GTX 750
