Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs P102-100
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Popular choices:
P102-100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar P102-100
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the P102-100 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | P102-100 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) |
| Longevity | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) (10nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and P102-100
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 96 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 28W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.
P102-100
The P102-100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 12 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1582 MHz to 1683 MHz. It has 3200 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,301 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs scores 3,311 and the P102-100 reaches 3,301 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is built on Gen. 11 Ice Lake while the P102-100 uses Pascal, both on 10 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 96 (Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs) vs 3,200 (P102-100). Boost clocks: 1350 MHz vs 1683 MHz.
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | P102-100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,311 | 3,301 |
| Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake | Pascal |
| Process Node | 10 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 96 | 3200+3233% |
| Boost Clock | 1350 MHz | 1683 MHz+25% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | P102-100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the P102-100 has 2 GB. The P102-100 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | P102-100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs) vs 12_1 (P102-100). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | P102-100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs draws 28W versus the P102-100's 250W — a 159.7% difference. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs) vs 350W (P102-100). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | P102-100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 28W-89% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 118.3+796% | 13.2 |
Value Analysis
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the P102-100 launched at $600 and now averages $80. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs costs 100+% less ($80 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs) vs 41.3 (P102-100) — the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs offers Infinity% better value. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2018).
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | P102-100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $600 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $80 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 41.3 |
| Codename | Tiger Lake Xe | GP102 |
| Release | August 15 2020 | February 12 2018 |
| Ranking | #536 | #560 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and P102-100
