GeForce GTX 750 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 750

2014Core: 1020 MHzBoost: 1085 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

2020Core: 400 MHzBoost: 1350 MHz
Similar parts
······

GeForce GTX 750 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 750 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 750

2014

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 27.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($120 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 750 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 96.4% higher power demand at 55W vs 28W.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

2020

Why buy it

  • Draws 28W instead of 55W, a 27W reduction.
  • More future proof: Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) on 10nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2020 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 27.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $120 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 750 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0% in PassMark G3D (3,312 vs 3,311), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 750 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 750 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce GTX 750 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 750

The GeForce GTX 750 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 18 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1020 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,312 points. Launch price was $119.

Intel

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 96 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 28W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 750 scores 3,312 and the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs reaches 3,311 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 750 is built on Maxwell while the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 28 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 512 (GeForce GTX 750) vs 96 (Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs). Boost clocks: 1085 MHz vs 1350 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 750Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
G3D Mark Score
3,312
3,311
Architecture
Maxwell
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Process Node
28 nm
10 nm
Shading Units
512+433%
96
Boost Clock
1085 MHz
1350 MHz+24%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 750 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 750Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 750 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs carries 0 MB. GeForce GTX 750 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 750 and System on the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.

FeatureGeForce GTX 750Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
80 GB/s
System
Bus Width
128-bit
System
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_0 (GeForce GTX 750) vs 12.1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 750Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
DirectX
12_0
12.1
Max Displays
3
4+33%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 3rd Gen (GeForce GTX 750) vs QuickSync (Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: H.264 (GeForce GTX 750) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs).

FeatureGeForce GTX 750Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Encoder
NVENC 3rd Gen
QuickSync
Decoder
NVDEC 1st Gen
QuickSync
Codecs
H.264
H.264,HEVC,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 750 draws 55W versus the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs's 28W — a 65.1% difference. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 750) vs 1W (Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs). Power connectors: None vs Integrated.

FeatureGeForce GTX 750Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
TDP
55W
28W-49%
Recommended PSU
300W
1W-100%
Power Connector
None
Integrated
Length
145mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
60.2
118.3+97%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 750 came in at $120, while the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs launched at $0. On MSRP, Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs was 100+% cheaper ($120 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 27.6 (GeForce GTX 750) vs Infinity (Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs) — the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (2020 vs 2014).

FeatureGeForce GTX 750Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
MSRP
$120
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
27.6
Infinity
Codename
GM107
Tiger Lake Xe
Release
February 18 2014
August 15 2020
Ranking
#559
#536

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.