
GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition vs GeForce GTX 750

GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 750
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition is positioned at rank #228 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 750 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition.
| Insight | GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition | GeForce GTX 750 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 750 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 750 holds the technical lead. Priced at $35 (vs $40), it costs 13% less, resulting in a 14.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition | GeForce GTX 750 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+14.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40) | ✅More affordable ($35) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition and GeForce GTX 750

GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition
The GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 8 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 926 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.

GeForce GTX 750
The GeForce GTX 750 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 18 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1020 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,312 points. Launch price was $119.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition scores 3,311 and the GeForce GTX 750 reaches 3,312 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 750 uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition) vs 512 (GeForce GTX 750). Raw compute: 0.7112 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition) vs 1.111 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 750).
| Feature | GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition | GeForce GTX 750 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,311 | 3,312 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 512+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7112 TFLOPS | 1.111 TFLOPS+56% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 256 KB+700% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition | GeForce GTX 750 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 750) — the GeForce GTX 750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition | GeForce GTX 750 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 80 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition) vs 12_0 (GeForce GTX 750). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition | GeForce GTX 750 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (1st Gen) (GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition) vs NVENC 3rd Gen (GeForce GTX 750). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs NVDEC 1st Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition) vs H.264 (GeForce GTX 750).
| Feature | GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition | GeForce GTX 750 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (1st Gen) | NVENC 3rd Gen |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP5 | NVDEC 1st Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition draws 50W versus the GeForce GTX 750's 55W — a 9.5% difference. The GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 750). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition | GeForce GTX 750 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-9% | 55W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | — | 145mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 66.2+10% | 60.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the GeForce GTX 750 launched at $120 and now averages $35. The GeForce GTX 750 costs 12.5% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 82.8 (GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition) vs 94.6 (GeForce GTX 750) — the GeForce GTX 750 offers 14.3% better value. The GeForce GTX 750 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition | GeForce GTX 750 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149 | $120-19% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40 | $35-13% |
| Performance per Dollar | 82.8 | 94.6+14% |
| Codename | GK107 | GM107 |
| Release | November 8 2013 | February 18 2014 |
| Ranking | #735 | #559 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















