GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition vs P102-100
GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition
Popular choices:
P102-100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition is positioned at rank 228 and the P102-100 is on rank 201, so the P102-100 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition
Performance Per Dollar P102-100
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The P102-100 uses modern memory architecture. The P102-100 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the P102-100.
| Insight | GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition | P102-100 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $40 versus $80 for the P102-100, it costs 50% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 100.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition | P102-100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+100.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($40) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($80) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition and P102-100
GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition
The GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 8 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 926 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.
P102-100
The P102-100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 12 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1582 MHz to 1683 MHz. It has 3200 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,301 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition scores 3,311 and the P102-100 reaches 3,301 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition is built on Kepler while the P102-100 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition) vs 3,200 (P102-100). Raw compute: 0.7112 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition) vs 10.77 TFLOPS (P102-100).
| Feature | GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition | P102-100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,311 | 3,301 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 3200+733% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7112 TFLOPS | 10.77 TFLOPS+1414% |
| ROPs | 16 | 80+400% |
| TMUs | 32 | 200+525% |
| L1 Cache | 0.03 MB | 1.2 MB+3900% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2.5 MB+900% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition | P102-100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition) vs 2.5 MB (P102-100) — the P102-100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition | P102-100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2.5 MB+900% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition) vs 12_1 (P102-100). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition | P102-100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition draws 50W versus the P102-100's 250W — a 133.3% difference. The GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition) vs 350W (P102-100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition | P102-100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-80% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 66.2+402% | 13.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the P102-100 launched at $600 and now averages $80. The GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition costs 50% less ($40 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 82.8 (GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition) vs 41.3 (P102-100) — the GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition offers 100.5% better value. The P102-100 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition | P102-100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-75% | $600 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-50% | $80 |
| Performance per Dollar | 82.8+100% | 41.3 |
| Codename | GK107 | GP102 |
| Release | November 8 2013 | February 12 2018 |
| Ranking | #735 | #560 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition and P102-100
