
GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition

GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition vs GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition vs GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition vs GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition
2013Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 106W, a 56W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌15.5% HIGHER MSRP$149 MSRPvs$129 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 22.2 vs 25.8 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
2011Why buy it
- ✅20.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 16.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 25.8 vs 22.2 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌112% higher power demand at 106W vs 50W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition vs GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition
The GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 8 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 926 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.

GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 15 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 783 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 106W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,331 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition scores 3,311 and the GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 reaches 3,331 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition) vs 192 (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2). Raw compute: 0.7112 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition) vs 0.6013 TFLOPS (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2).
| Feature | GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,311 | 3,331 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+100% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7112 TFLOPS+18% | 0.6013 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 256 KB+700% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition and 128-bit on the GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2.
| Feature | GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (1st Gen) (GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition) vs PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2).
| Feature | GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (1st Gen) | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP5 | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition draws 50W versus the GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2's 106W — a 71.8% difference. The GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition) vs 400W (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 68°C.
| Feature | GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-53% | 106W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-13% | 400W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 210mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 68°C-20% |
| Perf/Watt | 66.2+111% | 31.4 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition came in at $149, while the GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 launched at $129. On MSRP, GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 was 13.4% cheaper ($20 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 22.2 (GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition) vs 25.8 (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) — the GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 offers 16.2% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition (2013 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149 | $129-13% |
| Performance per Dollar | 22.2 | 25.8+16% |
| Codename | GK107 | GF116 |
| Release | November 8 2013 | March 15 2011 |
| Ranking | #735 | #739 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














