GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition vs GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition

2013Core: 926 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2

2011Core: 783 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition vs GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition vs GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition vs GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition

2013

Why buy it

  • Draws 50W instead of 106W, a 56W reduction.
  • More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 15.5% HIGHER MSRP
    $149 MSRPvs$129 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 22.2 vs 25.8 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).

GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2

2011

Why buy it

  • 20.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $20 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • Delivers 16.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 25.8 vs 22.2 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 112% higher power demand at 106W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 20.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.6% in PassMark G3D (3,331 vs 3,311), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2013 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $20 cheaper on MSRP at $129 vs $149, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 16.2% (25.8 vs 22.2), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition vs GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition

The GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 8 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 926 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2

The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 15 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 783 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 106W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,331 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition scores 3,311 and the GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 reaches 3,331 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition) vs 192 (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2). Raw compute: 0.7112 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition) vs 0.6013 TFLOPS (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2).

FeatureGeForce GT 750M Mac EditionGeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
G3D Mark Score
3,311
3,331
Architecture
Kepler
Fermi 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
384+100%
192
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7112 TFLOPS+18%
0.6013 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
32
32
L1 Cache
32 KB
256 KB+700%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GT 750M Mac EditionGeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition and 128-bit on the GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2.

FeatureGeForce GT 750M Mac EditionGeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce GT 750M Mac EditionGeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4+100%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (1st Gen) (GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition) vs PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2).

FeatureGeForce GT 750M Mac EditionGeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
Encoder
NVENC (1st Gen)
PureVideo HD VP4
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP5
PureVideo HD VP4
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition draws 50W versus the GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2's 106W — a 71.8% difference. The GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition) vs 400W (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 68°C.

FeatureGeForce GT 750M Mac EditionGeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
TDP
50W-53%
106W
Recommended PSU
350W-13%
400W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
210mm
Height
111mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
85°C
68°C-20%
Perf/Watt
66.2+111%
31.4
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition came in at $149, while the GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 launched at $129. On MSRP, GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 was 13.4% cheaper ($20 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 22.2 (GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition) vs 25.8 (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) — the GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 offers 16.2% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition (2013 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce GT 750M Mac EditionGeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
MSRP
$149
$129-13%
Performance per Dollar
22.2
25.8+16%
Codename
GK107
GF116
Release
November 8 2013
March 15 2011
Ranking
#735
#739

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.