GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition vs Radeon RX 560X

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition vs Radeon RX 560X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition vs Radeon RX 560X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 560X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
15.5% HIGHER MSRP
$149 MSRPvs$129 MSRP

Radeon RX 560X

2018

Why buy it

✅166.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
✅Delivers 16.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 25.9 vs 22.2 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon RX 560X is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 166.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.9% in PassMark G3D (3,340 vs 3,311), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 560X is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, the newer feature stack, with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) and FSR Frame Generation (2023), while GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 14nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2018 generation instead of 2013. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon RX 560X makes the most sense to buy today. It is $20 cheaper on MSRP at $129 vs $149, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 16.5% (25.9 vs 22.2), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition vs Radeon RX 560X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition

The GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 8 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 926 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.

Radeon RX 560X

The Radeon RX 560X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 11 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1175 MHz to 1275 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,340 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition scores 3,311 and the Radeon RX 560X reaches 3,340 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition is built on Kepler while the Radeon RX 560X uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition) vs 1,024 (Radeon RX 560X). Raw compute: 0.7112 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition) vs 2.611 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 560X).

Feature	GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition	Radeon RX 560X
G3D Mark Score	3,311	3,340
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 4.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	384	1024+167%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7112 TFLOPS	2.611 TFLOPS+267%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	32	64+100%
L1 Cache	32 KB	256 KB+700%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	1 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 560X is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX 560X leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition	Radeon RX 560X
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 560X carries 4 GB. Radeon RX 560X gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition and 256-bit on the Radeon RX 560X. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 560X) — the Radeon RX 560X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition	Radeon RX 560X
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	64-bit	256-bit+300%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	1 MB+300%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition draws 50W versus the Radeon RX 560X's 75W — a 40% difference. The GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition) vs 400W (Radeon RX 560X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

Feature	GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition	Radeon RX 560X
TDP	50W-33%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W-13%	400W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	85°C	—
Perf/Watt	66.2+49%	44.5

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition came in at $149, while the Radeon RX 560X launched at $129. On MSRP, Radeon RX 560X was 13.4% cheaper ($20 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 22.2 (GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition) vs 25.9 (Radeon RX 560X) — the Radeon RX 560X offers 16.7% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 560X (2018 vs 2013).

Feature	GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition	Radeon RX 560X
MSRP	$149	$129-13%
Performance per Dollar	22.2	25.9+17%
Codename	GK107	Polaris 21
Release	November 8 2013	April 11 2018
Ranking	#735	#556

Search GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition on Amazon

Search Radeon RX 560X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.