Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

GeForce GTX 750 vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 750

2014Core: 1020 MHzBoost: 1085 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

2020
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

GeForce GTX 750 vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Performance Spectrum

GeForce GTX 750
2 GB 55
3,312
0.0%
brand logoGeForce 945A
brand logoGeForce GTX 745
brand logoGeForce GTX 950M
brand logoGeForce MX350
brand logoGeForce RTX 2050
brand logoGeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
brand logoGeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
brand logoGeForce RTX 5060
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
2 GB 30
3,390
+2.4%
brand logoRadeon R7 450
brand logoRadeon HD 6970M
brand logoRadeon HD 8770
brand logoRadeon HD 6990
brand logoGeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design
brand logoGeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
brand logoRadeon RX 6600 XT
brand logoGeForce RTX 5060

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 750 vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 750

2014

Why buy it

  • ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    20% HIGHER MSRP
    $120 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 27.6 vs 33.9 G3D/$ ($120 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • ❌83.3% higher power demand at 55W vs 30W.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

2020

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $120 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 22.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.9 vs 27.6 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $120 MSRP).
  • ✅GeForce GTX 750 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • ✅Draws 30W instead of 55W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.4% in PassMark G3D (3,390 vs 3,312), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 10nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2014. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $20 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $120, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 22.8% (33.9 vs 27.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 750 vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 750

The GeForce GTX 750 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 18 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1020 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,312 points. Launch price was $119.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. It has 96 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,390 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 750 scores 3,312 and the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 reaches 3,390 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 750 is built on Maxwell while the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 28 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 512 (GeForce GTX 750) vs 96 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7).

FeatureGeForce GTX 750Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
G3D Mark Score
3,312
3,390+2%
Architecture
Maxwell
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Process Node
28 nm
10 nm
Shading Units
512+433%
96
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 750 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 750Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 750 and 64-bit on the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7.

FeatureGeForce GTX 750Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_0 (GeForce GTX 750) vs 12.1 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 750Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
DirectX
12_0
12.1
Max Displays
3
4+33%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 3rd Gen (GeForce GTX 750) vs QuickSync (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: H.264 (GeForce GTX 750) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,MPEG-2 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7).

FeatureGeForce GTX 750Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Encoder
NVENC 3rd Gen
QuickSync
Decoder
NVDEC 1st Gen
QuickSync
Codecs
H.264
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 750 draws 55W versus the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7's 30W — a 58.8% difference. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 750) vs 350W (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 145mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 750Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
TDP
55W
30W-45%
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
145mm
0mm
Height
—
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
—
85
Perf/Watt
60.2
113.0+88%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 750 came in at $120, while the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 launched at $100. On MSRP, Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 was 16.7% cheaper ($20 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 27.6 (GeForce GTX 750) vs 33.9 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7) — the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 offers 22.8% better value. The newer card here is Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 (2020 vs 2014).

FeatureGeForce GTX 750Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
MSRP
$120
$100-17%
Performance per Dollar
27.6
33.9+23%
Codename
GM107
Tiger Lake Xe
Release
February 18 2014
August 15 2020
Ranking
#559
#508
Search GeForce GTX 750 on AmazonSearch Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.