GeForce GTX 750
VS
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

GeForce GTX 750 vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 750

2014Core: 1020 MHzBoost: 1085 MHz

Popular choices:

RTX 4060•RTX 3060•RTX 4060 Ti•RTX 3070•GTX 1650•RTX 3060 Ti•RTX 4070•RTX 3050•RX 7600•RTX 4070 Ti
VS

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

2020

Popular choices:

RTX 4060•RTX 3060•RTX 4060 Ti•RTX 3070•GTX 1650•RTX 3060 Ti•RTX 4070•RTX 3050•RX 7600•RTX 4070 Ti

Performance Spectrum - GPU

GeForce GTX 750
55
3,312
0.0%
brand logoGeForce 945A
brand logoGeForce GTX 745
brand logoGeForce GTX 950M
brand logoGeForce MX350
brand logoGeForce RTX 2050
brand logoGeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
brand logoGeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
brand logoGeForce RTX 5060
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
30
3,390
+2.4%
brand logoRadeon RX Vega 11 Ryzen 5 3350G
brand logoRadeon HD 6970M
brand logoRadeon HD 8770
brand logoRadeon HD 6990
brand logoGeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design
brand logoGeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
brand logoRadeon RX 6600 XT
brand logoGeForce RTX 5060

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

#42
Radeon RX 6600S
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
96%
#140
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
320%
#142
GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150
290%
#143
GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100
290%
#147
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
263%
#148
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
262%
#150
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
100%
#157
GeForce 830M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
99%
#158
GeForce GT 750M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
98%
#159
GeForce GT 425M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $25
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is significantly newer (2020 vs 2014). The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 750 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 750.

InsightGeForce GTX 750Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Performance
❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.4%)
✅Leading raw performance (+2.4%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) (10nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
—

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 750 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $35 versus $50 for the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7, it costs 30% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 39.6% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce GTX 750Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Cost Efficiency
✅Better overall value (+39.6%)
❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
✅More affordable ($35)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 750 Benchmark Check

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080p
low12 FPS
medium8 FPS
high4 FPS
ultra3 FPS
1440p
low7 FPS
medium5 FPS
high3 FPS
ultra2 FPS
4K
low4 FPS
medium2 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080p
low153 FPS
medium122 FPS
high102 FPS
ultra76 FPS
1440p
low96 FPS
medium65 FPS
high53 FPS
ultra37 FPS
4K
low30 FPS
medium23 FPS
high21 FPS
ultra13 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080p
low80 FPS
medium56 FPS
high37 FPS
ultra20 FPS
1440p
low26 FPS
medium19 FPS
high12 FPS
ultra7 FPS
4K
low7 FPS
medium5 FPS
high3 FPS
ultra2 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080p
low146 FPS
medium99 FPS
high61 FPS
ultra33 FPS
1440p
low62 FPS
medium48 FPS
high26 FPS
ultra17 FPS
4K
low23 FPS
medium17 FPS
high9 FPS
ultra7 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080p
low149 FPS
medium119 FPS
high99 FPS
ultra75 FPS
1440p
low112 FPS
medium89 FPS
high75 FPS
ultra56 FPS
4K
low75 FPS
medium60 FPS
high50 FPS
ultra37 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080p
low153 FPS
medium122 FPS
high102 FPS
ultra76 FPS
1440p
low114 FPS
medium92 FPS
high76 FPS
ultra57 FPS
4K
low76 FPS
medium61 FPS
high51 FPS
ultra38 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080p
low149 FPS
medium119 FPS
high99 FPS
ultra75 FPS
1440p
low109 FPS
medium89 FPS
high68 FPS
ultra53 FPS
4K
low58 FPS
medium50 FPS
high33 FPS
ultra24 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080p
low118 FPS
medium103 FPS
high77 FPS
ultra56 FPS
1440p
low79 FPS
medium69 FPS
high51 FPS
ultra37 FPS
4K
low50 FPS
medium41 FPS
high25 FPS
ultra19 FPS
Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 750 and Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 750

The GeForce GTX 750 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 18 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1020 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,312 points. Launch price was $119.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. It has 96 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,390 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 750 scores 3,312 and the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 reaches 3,390 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 750 is built on Maxwell while the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 28 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 512 (GeForce GTX 750) vs 96 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7).

FeatureGeForce GTX 750Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
G3D Mark Score
3,312
3,390+2%
Architecture
Maxwell
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Process Node
28 nm
10 nm
Shading Units
512+433%
96
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 750Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureGeForce GTX 750Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_0 (GeForce GTX 750) vs 12.1 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 750Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
DirectX
12_0
12.1
Max Displays
3
4+33%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 3rd Gen (GeForce GTX 750) vs QuickSync (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: H.264 (GeForce GTX 750) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,MPEG-2 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7).

FeatureGeForce GTX 750Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Encoder
NVENC 3rd Gen
QuickSync
Decoder
NVDEC 1st Gen
QuickSync
Codecs
H.264
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 750 draws 55W versus the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7's 30W — a 58.8% difference. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 750) vs 350W (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 145mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 750Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
TDP
55W
30W-45%
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
145mm
0mm
Height
—
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
—
85
Perf/Watt
60.2
113.0+88%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 750 launched at $120 MSRP and currently averages $35, while the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 launched at $100 and now averages $50. The GeForce GTX 750 costs 30% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 94.6 (GeForce GTX 750) vs 67.8 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7) — the GeForce GTX 750 offers 39.5% better value. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2014).

FeatureGeForce GTX 750Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
MSRP
$120
$100-17%
Avg Price (30d)
$35-30%
$50
Performance per Dollar
94.6+40%
67.8
Codename
GM107
Tiger Lake Xe
Release
February 18 2014
August 15 2020
Ranking
#559
#508