GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 vs GeForce GTX 750

NVIDIA

GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2

2011Core: 783 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 750

2014Core: 1020 MHzBoost: 1085 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 vs GeForce GTX 750 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 vs GeForce GTX 750 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 vs GeForce GTX 750: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2

2011

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 750 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 7.5% HIGHER MSRP
    $129 MSRPvs$120 MSRP
  • 92.7% higher power demand at 106W vs 55W.
  • 44.8% longer card at 210mm vs 145mm.

GeForce GTX 750

2014

Why buy it

  • 66.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $9 less on MSRP ($120 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
  • Draws 55W instead of 106W, a 51W reduction.
  • Measures 145mm instead of 210mm, a 65mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • 2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 750 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 66.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 instead at 3,331 vs 3,312, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 750 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $9 cheaper on MSRP at $120 vs $129, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 6.9% (27.6 vs 25.8), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 750 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 vs GeForce GTX 750 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2

The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 15 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 783 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 106W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,331 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 750

The GeForce GTX 750 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 18 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1020 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,312 points. Launch price was $119.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 scores 3,331 and the GeForce GTX 750 reaches 3,312 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 750 uses Maxwell, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs 512 (GeForce GTX 750). Raw compute: 0.6013 TFLOPS (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs 1.111 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 750).

FeatureGeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2GeForce GTX 750
G3D Mark Score
3,331
3,312
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
Maxwell
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
192
512+167%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6013 TFLOPS
1.111 TFLOPS+85%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
32
32
L1 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
2 MB+700%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2GeForce GTX 750
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 750. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 750) — the GeForce GTX 750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2GeForce GTX 750
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
80 GB/s
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
2 MB+700%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs 12_0 (GeForce GTX 750). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.

FeatureGeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2GeForce GTX 750
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12_0
Max Displays
2
3+50%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs NVENC 3rd Gen (GeForce GTX 750). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs NVDEC 1st Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs H.264 (GeForce GTX 750).

FeatureGeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2GeForce GTX 750
Encoder
PureVideo HD VP4
NVENC 3rd Gen
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP4
NVDEC 1st Gen
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 draws 106W versus the GeForce GTX 750's 55W — a 63.4% difference. The GeForce GTX 750 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 750). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None. Card length: 210mm vs 145mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2GeForce GTX 750
TDP
106W
55W-48%
Recommended PSU
400W
300W-25%
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
None
Length
210mm
145mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
1-50%
Temp (Load)
68°C
Perf/Watt
31.4
60.2+92%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 came in at $129, while the GeForce GTX 750 launched at $120. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 750 was 7% cheaper ($9 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 25.8 (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs 27.6 (GeForce GTX 750) — the GeForce GTX 750 offers 7% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 750 (2014 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2GeForce GTX 750
MSRP
$129
$120-7%
Performance per Dollar
25.8
27.6+7%
Codename
GF116
GM107
Release
March 15 2011
February 18 2014
Ranking
#739
#559

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.