Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2

2011Core: 783 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

2020
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Performance Spectrum

GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
2 GB 106
3,331
0.0%
brand logoGeForce GTX 675M
brand logoGeForce GTX 745
brand logoGeForce GTX 950M
brand logoGeForce GTX 675MX
brand logoGeForce RTX 2050
brand logoGeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
brand logoGeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
brand logoGeForce RTX 5060
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
2 GB 30
3,390
+1.8%
brand logoRadeon R7 450
brand logoRadeon HD 6970M
brand logoRadeon HD 8770
brand logoRadeon HD 6990
brand logoGeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design
brand logoGeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
brand logoRadeon RX 6600 XT
brand logoGeForce RTX 5060

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2

2011

Why buy it

  • ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    29% HIGHER MSRP
    $129 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 25.8 vs 33.9 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • ❌253.3% higher power demand at 106W vs 30W.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

2020

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $29 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 31.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.9 vs 25.8 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
  • ✅GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • ✅Draws 30W instead of 106W, a 76W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.8% in PassMark G3D (3,390 vs 3,331), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 10nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $29 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $129, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 31.3% (33.9 vs 25.8), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2

The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 15 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 783 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 106W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,331 points.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. It has 96 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,390 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 scores 3,331 and the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 reaches 3,390 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 40 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 192 (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs 96 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7).

FeatureGeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
G3D Mark Score
3,331
3,390+2%
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Process Node
40 nm
10 nm
Shading Units
192+100%
96
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 and 64-bit on the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7.

FeatureGeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs 12.1 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12.1
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
2
4+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs QuickSync (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,MPEG-2 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7).

FeatureGeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Encoder
PureVideo HD VP4
QuickSync
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP4
QuickSync
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 draws 106W versus the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7's 30W — a 111.8% difference. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs 350W (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 210mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 68°C vs 85.

FeatureGeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
TDP
106W
30W-72%
Recommended PSU
400W
350W-13%
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
210mm
0mm
Height
111mm
0mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
68°C-20%
85
Perf/Watt
31.4
113.0+260%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 came in at $129, while the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 launched at $100. On MSRP, Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 was 22.5% cheaper ($29 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 25.8 (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs 33.9 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7) — the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 offers 31.4% better value. The newer card here is Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 (2020 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
MSRP
$129
$100-22%
Performance per Dollar
25.8
33.9+31%
Codename
GF116
Tiger Lake Xe
Release
March 15 2011
August 15 2020
Ranking
#739
#508
Search GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 on AmazonSearch Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.