GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
Popular choices:
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is significantly newer (2020 vs 2011). The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2.
| Insight | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) (10nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $30 versus $50 for the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7, it costs 40% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 63.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+63.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($30) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 and Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 15 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 783 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 106W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,331 points.
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. It has 96 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,390 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 scores 3,331 and the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 reaches 3,390 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 40 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 192 (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs 96 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7).
| Feature | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,331 | 3,390+2% |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 192+100% | 96 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs 12.1 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs QuickSync (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,MPEG-2 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7).
| Feature | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | QuickSync |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | QuickSync |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 draws 106W versus the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7's 30W — a 111.8% difference. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs 350W (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 210mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 68°C vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 106W | 30W-72% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 350W-13% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 210mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 68°C-20% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 31.4 | 113.0+260% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 launched at $129 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 launched at $100 and now averages $50. The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 costs 40% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 111.0 (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs 67.8 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7) — the GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 offers 63.7% better value. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129 | $100-22% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-40% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 111.0+64% | 67.8 |
| Codename | GF116 | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Release | March 15 2011 | August 15 2020 |
| Ranking | #739 | #508 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 and Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
