GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 vs Tesla C2050 / C2070

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 vs Tesla C2050 / C2070 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 vs Tesla C2050 / C2070: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2

2011

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,370 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1782.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 25.8 vs 1.4 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
✅Draws 106W instead of 238W, a 132W reduction.
✅Measures 210mm instead of 248mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Tesla C2050 / C2070

2011

Why buy it

✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
✅More future proof: Fermi (2010−2014) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
1837.2% HIGHER MSRP
$2,499 MSRPvs$129 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.4 vs 25.8 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
❌124.5% higher power demand at 238W vs 106W.
❌18.1% longer card at 248mm vs 210mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Tesla C2050 / C2070 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.9% in PassMark G3D (3,428 vs 3,331), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,370 cheaper on MSRP at $129 vs $2,499, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1782.4% (25.8 vs 1.4), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Tesla C2050 / C2070 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 vs Tesla C2050 / C2070 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2

The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 15 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 783 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 106W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,331 points.

Tesla C2050 / C2070

The Tesla C2050 / C2070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 238W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,428 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 scores 3,331 and the Tesla C2050 / C2070 reaches 3,428 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Tesla C2050 / C2070 uses Fermi, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 192 (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs 448 (Tesla C2050 / C2070). Raw compute: 0.6013 TFLOPS (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs 1.028 TFLOPS (Tesla C2050 / C2070).

Feature	GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2	Tesla C2050 / C2070
G3D Mark Score	3,331	3,428+3%
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	Fermi
Process Node	40 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	192	448+133%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6013 TFLOPS	1.028 TFLOPS+71%
ROPs	16	48+200%
TMUs	32	56+75%
L1 Cache	256 KB	896 KB+250%
L2 Cache	256 KB	768 KB+200%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Tesla C2050 / C2070 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2	Tesla C2050 / C2070
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla C2050 / C2070 carries 6 GB. Tesla C2050 / C2070 gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 and 64-bit on the Tesla C2050 / C2070. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs 768 KB (Tesla C2050 / C2070) — the Tesla C2050 / C2070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2	Tesla C2050 / C2070
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	6 GB+200%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	768 KB+200%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs 11_0 (Tesla C2050 / C2070). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.

Feature	GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2	Tesla C2050 / C2070
DirectX	12 (11_0)+9%	11_0
Max Displays	2+100%	1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 draws 106W versus the Tesla C2050 / C2070's 238W — a 76.7% difference. The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs 350W (Tesla C2050 / C2070). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 210mm vs 248mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

Feature	GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2	Tesla C2050 / C2070
TDP	106W-55%	238W
Recommended PSU	400W	350W-13%
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	210mm	248mm
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	68°C	—
Perf/Watt	31.4+118%	14.4

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 came in at $129, while the Tesla C2050 / C2070 launched at $2499. On MSRP, GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 was 94.8% cheaper ($2370 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 25.8 (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs 1.4 (Tesla C2050 / C2070) — the GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 offers 1742.9% better value.

Feature	GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2	Tesla C2050 / C2070
MSRP	$129-95%	$2499
Performance per Dollar	25.8+1743%	1.4
Codename	GF116	GF100
Release	March 15 2011	July 25 2011
Ranking	#739	#569

Search GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 on Amazon

Search Tesla C2050 / C2070 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.