GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
VS
GeForce GTX 485M SLI

GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 vs GeForce GTX 485M SLI

NVIDIA

GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2

2011Core: 783 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 485M SLI

2011Core: 575 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 485M SLI

#53
Radeon RX 6850M XT
MSRP: $800|Avg: $800
97%
#217
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
485%
#219
439%
#220
438%
#224
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
398%
#225
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
396%
#227
GeForce GTX 485M SLI
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#228
GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition
MSRP: $149|Avg: $40
99%
#230
Maxwell GPU Surface Book
MSRP: $150|Avg: $75
99%
#235
Radeon RX 540
MSRP: $99|Avg: $40
96%
#236
Radeon HD 6750M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $60
95%
#237
Radeon HD 7570M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $15
94%
#239
Arc Graphics 130T
MSRP: $300|Avg: $250
92%
#240
GeForce MX570 A
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
92%
#242
GeForce GT 645
MSRP: $99|Avg: $15
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 485M SLI is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2.

InsightGeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2GeForce GTX 485M SLI
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%)
Leading raw performance (+0.9%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 485M SLI remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 and GeForce GTX 485M SLI

NVIDIA

GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2

The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 15 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 783 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 106W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,331 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 485M SLI

The GeForce GTX 485M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 6 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 575 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,360 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 scores 3,331 and the GeForce GTX 485M SLI reaches 3,360 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 485M SLI uses Fermi, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 192 (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 485M SLI).

FeatureGeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2GeForce GTX 485M SLI
G3D Mark Score
3,331
3,360
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
Fermi
Process Node
40 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
192
768+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2GeForce GTX 485M SLI
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureGeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2GeForce GTX 485M SLI
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 485M SLI). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2GeForce GTX 485M SLI
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
OpenGL
4.6+15%
4.0
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 485M SLI). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 485M SLI).

FeatureGeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2GeForce GTX 485M SLI
Encoder
PureVideo HD VP4
PureVideo HD VP4
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP4
PureVideo HD VP4
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 draws 106W versus the GeForce GTX 485M SLI's 100W — a 5.8% difference. The GeForce GTX 485M SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 485M SLI). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 68°C vs 92°C.

FeatureGeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2GeForce GTX 485M SLI
TDP
106W
100W-6%
Recommended PSU
400W
350W-13%
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
1x 6-pin
Length
210mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
68°C-26%
92°C
Perf/Watt
31.4
33.6+7%