
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 vs Iris Graphics 550

GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
Popular choices:

Iris Graphics 550
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (2 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Graphics 550.
| Insight | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 | Iris Graphics 550 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Generation 9.0 (2015−2016)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 and Iris Graphics 550

GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 15 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 783 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 106W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,331 points.

Iris Graphics 550
The Iris Graphics 550 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 scores 3,331 and the Iris Graphics 550 reaches 3,311 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Iris Graphics 550 uses Generation 9.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm+. Shader units: 192 (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs 384 (Iris Graphics 550). Raw compute: 0.6013 TFLOPS (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs 0.768 TFLOPS (Iris Graphics 550).
| Feature | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 | Iris Graphics 550 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,331 | 3,311 |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Generation 9.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 14 nm+ |
| Shading Units | 192 | 384+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6013 TFLOPS | 0.768 TFLOPS+28% |
| ROPs | 16+167% | 6 |
| TMUs | 32 | 48+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 | Iris Graphics 550 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Graphics 550 has 0 MB. The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 | Iris Graphics 550 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs 12 (12_1) (Iris Graphics 550). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 | Iris Graphics 550 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs Quick Sync Video (Iris Graphics 550). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs Quick Sync Video. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs H.264,H.265,VP8,VP9,JPEG (Iris Graphics 550).
| Feature | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 | Iris Graphics 550 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | Quick Sync Video |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | Quick Sync Video |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265,VP8,VP9,JPEG |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 draws 106W versus the Iris Graphics 550's 15W — a 150.4% difference. The Iris Graphics 550 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs 1W (Iris Graphics 550). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Integrated.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 | Iris Graphics 550 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 106W | 15W-86% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 210mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 68°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 31.4 | 220.7+603% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 launched at $129 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the Iris Graphics 550 launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Iris Graphics 550 costs 100+% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 111.0 (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs Infinity (Iris Graphics 550) — the Iris Graphics 550 offers Infinity% better value. The Iris Graphics 550 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 | Iris Graphics 550 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 111.0 | Infinity |
| Codename | GF116 | Skylake GT3e |
| Release | March 15 2011 | September 1 2015 |
| Ranking | #739 | #775 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












