GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
Iris Graphics 550
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 vs Iris Graphics 550 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 vs Iris Graphics 550 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 vs Iris Graphics 550: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
2011Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 25.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Iris Graphics 550 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌606.7% higher power demand at 106W vs 15W.
Iris Graphics 550
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 106W, a 91W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Generation 9.0 (2015−2016) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 25.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 vs Iris Graphics 550 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 15 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 783 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 106W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,331 points.
Iris Graphics 550
The Iris Graphics 550 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 scores 3,331 and the Iris Graphics 550 reaches 3,311 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Iris Graphics 550 uses Generation 9.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm+. Shader units: 192 (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs 384 (Iris Graphics 550). Raw compute: 0.6013 TFLOPS (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs 0.768 TFLOPS (Iris Graphics 550).
| Feature | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 | Iris Graphics 550 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,331 | 3,311 |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Generation 9.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 14 nm+ |
| Shading Units | 192 | 384+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6013 TFLOPS | 0.768 TFLOPS+28% |
| ROPs | 16+167% | 6 |
| TMUs | 32 | 48+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Iris Graphics 550 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 | Iris Graphics 550 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Graphics 550 carries 0 MB. GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 and System on the Iris Graphics 550.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 | Iris Graphics 550 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs 12 (12_1) (Iris Graphics 550). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 | Iris Graphics 550 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs Quick Sync Video (Iris Graphics 550). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs Quick Sync Video. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs H.264,H.265,VP8,VP9,JPEG (Iris Graphics 550).
| Feature | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 | Iris Graphics 550 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | Quick Sync Video |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | Quick Sync Video |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265,VP8,VP9,JPEG |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 draws 106W versus the Iris Graphics 550's 15W — a 150.4% difference. The Iris Graphics 550 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs 1W (Iris Graphics 550). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Integrated.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 | Iris Graphics 550 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 106W | 15W-86% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 210mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 68°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 31.4 | 220.7+603% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 came in at $129, while the Iris Graphics 550 launched at $0. On MSRP, Iris Graphics 550 was 100+% cheaper ($129 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 25.8 (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs Infinity (Iris Graphics 550) — the Iris Graphics 550 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Iris Graphics 550 (2015 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 | Iris Graphics 550 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 25.8 | Infinity |
| Codename | GF116 | Skylake GT3e |
| Release | March 15 2011 | September 1 2015 |
| Ranking | #739 | #775 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 and Iris Graphics 550
