GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 vs Radeon RX 560X
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
Popular choices:
Radeon RX 560X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 560X is significantly newer (2018 vs 2011). The Radeon RX 560X likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 560X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2.
| Insight | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 | Radeon RX 560X |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $30 versus $40 for the Radeon RX 560X, it costs 25% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 33% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 | Radeon RX 560X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+33%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($30) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 and Radeon RX 560X
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 15 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 783 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 106W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,331 points.
Radeon RX 560X
The Radeon RX 560X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 11 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1175 MHz to 1275 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,340 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 scores 3,331 and the Radeon RX 560X reaches 3,340 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon RX 560X uses GCN 4.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 192 (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs 1,024 (Radeon RX 560X). Raw compute: 0.6013 TFLOPS (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs 2.611 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 560X).
| Feature | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 | Radeon RX 560X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,331 | 3,340 |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 1024+433% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6013 TFLOPS | 2.611 TFLOPS+334% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 64+100% |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 | Radeon RX 560X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 560X has 4 GB. The Radeon RX 560X offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 560X) — the Radeon RX 560X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 | Radeon RX 560X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 draws 106W versus the Radeon RX 560X's 75W — a 34.3% difference. The Radeon RX 560X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs 400W (Radeon RX 560X). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 | Radeon RX 560X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 106W | 75W-29% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 400W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Length | 210mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 68°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 31.4 | 44.5+42% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 launched at $129 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the Radeon RX 560X launched at $129 and now averages $40. The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 costs 25% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 111.0 (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs 83.5 (Radeon RX 560X) — the GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 offers 32.9% better value. The Radeon RX 560X is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 | Radeon RX 560X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129 | $129 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-25% | $40 |
| Performance per Dollar | 111.0+33% | 83.5 |
| Codename | GF116 | Polaris 21 |
| Release | March 15 2011 | April 11 2018 |
| Ranking | #739 | #556 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 and Radeon RX 560X
