G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2

2011

Why buy it

✅Costs $40 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
✅Delivers 27.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 25.8 vs 20.2 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
✅Draws 106W instead of 134W, a 28W reduction.
✅Measures 210mm instead of 241mm, a 31mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST

2013

Why buy it

✅55.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
31% HIGHER MSRP
$169 MSRPvs$129 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 20.2 vs 25.8 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
❌26.4% higher power demand at 134W vs 106W.
❌14.8% longer card at 241mm vs 210mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 55.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.5% in PassMark G3D (3,415 vs 3,331), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $40 cheaper on MSRP at $129 vs $169, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 27.8% (25.8 vs 20.2), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2

The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 15 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 783 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 106W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,331 points.

GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST

The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 26 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 134W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,415 points. Launch price was $169.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 scores 3,331 and the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST reaches 3,415 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST). Raw compute: 0.6013 TFLOPS (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs 1.585 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST).

Feature	GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2	GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
G3D Mark Score	3,331	3,415+3%
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	Kepler
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	192	768+300%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6013 TFLOPS	1.585 TFLOPS+164%
ROPs	16	24+50%
TMUs	32	64+100%
L1 Cache	256 KB+300%	64 KB
L2 Cache	256 KB	384 KB+50%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2	GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs 384 KB (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) — the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2	GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	384 KB+50%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs 12 (FL 11_0) (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2	GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (FL 11_0)
Vulkan	1.2+9%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6+5%	4.4
Max Displays	2	4+100%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs PureVideo VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST).

Feature	GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2	GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
Encoder	PureVideo HD VP4	NVENC 1st gen
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP4	PureVideo VP5
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 draws 106W versus the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST's 134W — a 23.3% difference. The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs 450W (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 210mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 68°C vs 97°C.

Feature	GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2	GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
TDP	106W-21%	134W
Recommended PSU	400W-11%	450W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	1x 6-pin
Length	210mm	241mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	68°C-30%	97°C
Perf/Watt	31.4+23%	25.5

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 came in at $129, while the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST launched at $169. On MSRP, GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 was 23.7% cheaper ($40 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 25.8 (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs 20.2 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) — the GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 offers 27.7% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST (2013 vs 2011).

Feature	GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2	GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
MSRP	$129-24%	$169
Performance per Dollar	25.8+28%	20.2
Codename	GF116	GK106
Release	March 15 2011	March 26 2013
Ranking	#739	#551

Search GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 on Amazon

Search GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.