G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 vs Quadro M2000M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 vs Quadro M2000M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2

2011

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 25.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro M2000M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌92.7% higher power demand at 106W vs 55W.

Quadro M2000M

2015

Why buy it

✅77.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Draws 55W instead of 106W, a 51W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 25.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $129 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro M2000M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 77.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.4% in PassMark G3D (3,410 vs 3,331), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Quadro M2000M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 vs Quadro M2000M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2

The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 15 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 783 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 106W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,331 points.

Quadro M2000M

The Quadro M2000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 3 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1098 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,410 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 scores 3,331 and the Quadro M2000M reaches 3,410 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Quadro M2000M uses Maxwell, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs 640 (Quadro M2000M). Raw compute: 0.6013 TFLOPS (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs 1.405 TFLOPS (Quadro M2000M).

Feature	GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2	Quadro M2000M
G3D Mark Score	3,331	3,410+2%
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	Maxwell
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	192	640+233%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6013 TFLOPS	1.405 TFLOPS+134%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	32	40+25%
L1 Cache	256 KB	320 KB+25%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro M2000M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2	Quadro M2000M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M2000M carries 4 GB. Quadro M2000M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 and 64-bit on the Quadro M2000M. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs 2 MB (Quadro M2000M) — the Quadro M2000M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2	Quadro M2000M
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs 12 (11_0) (Quadro M2000M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2	Quadro M2000M
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Vulkan	1.2	1.4+17%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	2	4+100%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs 4th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M2000M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs H.264,HEVC (Quadro M2000M).

Feature	GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2	Quadro M2000M
Encoder	PureVideo HD VP4	4th Gen NVENC (Maxwell)
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP4	PureVideo HD VP6
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 draws 106W versus the Quadro M2000M's 55W — a 63.4% difference. The Quadro M2000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs 350W (Quadro M2000M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 68°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2	Quadro M2000M
TDP	106W	55W-48%
Recommended PSU	400W	350W-13%
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	210mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	68°C-15%	80°C
Perf/Watt	31.4	62.0+97%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro M2000M (2015 vs 2011).

Feature	GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2	Quadro M2000M
MSRP	$129	—
Codename	GF116	GM107
Release	March 15 2011	December 3 2015
Ranking	#739	#550

Search GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 on Amazon

Search Quadro M2000M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.