GeForce GTX 485M SLI vs GeForce GTX 750

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 485M SLI

2011Core: 575 MHz
Similar parts
····
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 750

2014Core: 1020 MHzBoost: 1085 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 485M SLI vs GeForce GTX 750 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 485M SLI vs GeForce GTX 750 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 485M SLI vs GeForce GTX 750: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 485M SLI

2011

Why buy it

  • 33.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • 2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 27.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $120 MSRP).
  • 81.8% higher power demand at 100W vs 55W.

GeForce GTX 750

2014

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 27.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($120 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Draws 55W instead of 100W, a 45W reduction.
  • More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 485M SLI across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 485M SLI is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 33.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.4% in PassMark G3D (3,360 vs 3,312), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 485M SLI is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 750 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 750 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 485M SLI has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 485M SLI vs GeForce GTX 750 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 485M SLI

The GeForce GTX 485M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 6 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 575 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,360 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 750

The GeForce GTX 750 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 18 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1020 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,312 points. Launch price was $119.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 485M SLI scores 3,360 and the GeForce GTX 750 reaches 3,312 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 485M SLI is built on Fermi while the GeForce GTX 750 uses Maxwell, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 485M SLI) vs 512 (GeForce GTX 750).

FeatureGeForce GTX 485M SLIGeForce GTX 750
G3D Mark Score
3,360+1%
3,312
Architecture
Fermi
Maxwell
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
768+50%
512

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 485M SLIGeForce GTX 750
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 485M SLI and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 750.

FeatureGeForce GTX 485M SLIGeForce GTX 750
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
80 GB/s
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 485M SLI) vs 12_0 (GeForce GTX 750). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.

FeatureGeForce GTX 485M SLIGeForce GTX 750
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12_0
Max Displays
2
3+50%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 485M SLI) vs NVENC 3rd Gen (GeForce GTX 750). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs NVDEC 1st Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 485M SLI) vs H.264 (GeForce GTX 750).

FeatureGeForce GTX 485M SLIGeForce GTX 750
Encoder
PureVideo HD VP4
NVENC 3rd Gen
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP4
NVDEC 1st Gen
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP
H.264
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 485M SLI draws 100W versus the GeForce GTX 750's 55W — a 58.1% difference. The GeForce GTX 750 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 485M SLI) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 750). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None.

FeatureGeForce GTX 485M SLIGeForce GTX 750
TDP
100W
55W-45%
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
None
Length
145mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
92°C
Perf/Watt
33.6
60.2+79%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GTX 750 (2014 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce GTX 485M SLIGeForce GTX 750
MSRP
$120
Codename
N11E-GTX-A1
GM107
Release
January 6 2011
February 18 2014
Ranking
#542
#559

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.