GeForce GTX 485M SLI vs Tesla C2050 / C2070
GeForce GTX 485M SLI
Popular choices:
Tesla C2050 / C2070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 485M SLI is positioned at rank 227 and the Tesla C2050 / C2070 is on rank 327, so the GeForce GTX 485M SLI offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 485M SLI
Performance Per Dollar Tesla C2050 / C2070
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Tesla C2050 / C2070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score and 200% more VRAM (6 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 485M SLI.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 485M SLI | Tesla C2050 / C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+200%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (248mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Tesla C2050 / C2070 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 485M SLI and Tesla C2050 / C2070
GeForce GTX 485M SLI
The GeForce GTX 485M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 6 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 575 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,360 points.
Tesla C2050 / C2070
The Tesla C2050 / C2070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 238W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,428 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 485M SLI scores 3,360 and the Tesla C2050 / C2070 reaches 3,428 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 485M SLI is built on Fermi while the Tesla C2050 / C2070 uses Fermi, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 485M SLI) vs 448 (Tesla C2050 / C2070).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 485M SLI | Tesla C2050 / C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,360 | 3,428+2% |
| Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+71% | 448 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 485M SLI | Tesla C2050 / C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 485M SLI comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla C2050 / C2070 has 6 GB. The Tesla C2050 / C2070 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 485M SLI | Tesla C2050 / C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 6 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 485M SLI) vs 11_0 (Tesla C2050 / C2070). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 485M SLI | Tesla C2050 / C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0)+9% | 11_0 |
| Max Displays | 2+100% | 1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 485M SLI draws 100W versus the Tesla C2050 / C2070's 238W — a 81.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 485M SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 485M SLI) vs 350W (Tesla C2050 / C2070). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 485M SLI | Tesla C2050 / C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-58% | 238W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 248mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 92°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 33.6+133% | 14.4 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 485M SLI and Tesla C2050 / C2070
