
GeForce GTX 485M SLI

GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
GeForce GTX 485M SLI vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 485M SLI vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 485M SLI vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 485M SLI
2011Why buy it
- ✅42.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 134W, a 34W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 20.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
2013Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 485M SLI across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌34% higher power demand at 134W vs 100W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 485M SLI vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 485M SLI
The GeForce GTX 485M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 6 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 575 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,360 points.

GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 26 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 134W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,415 points. Launch price was $169.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 485M SLI scores 3,360 and the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST reaches 3,415 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 485M SLI is built on Fermi while the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 485M SLI) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 485M SLI | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,360 | 3,415+2% |
| Architecture | Fermi | Kepler |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 768 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 485M SLI | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 485M SLI and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 485M SLI | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 485M SLI) vs 12 (FL 11_0) (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.0 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 485M SLI | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (FL 11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.2+9% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.0 | 4.4+10% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 485M SLI) vs NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs PureVideo VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 485M SLI) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 485M SLI | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | NVENC 1st gen |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | PureVideo VP5 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 485M SLI draws 100W versus the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST's 134W — a 29.1% difference. The GeForce GTX 485M SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 485M SLI) vs 450W (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 92°C vs 97°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 485M SLI | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-25% | 134W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 241mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 92°C-5% | 97°C |
| Perf/Watt | 33.6+32% | 25.5 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST (2013 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 485M SLI | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $169 |
| Codename | N11E-GTX-A1 | GK106 |
| Release | January 6 2011 | March 26 2013 |
| Ranking | #542 | #551 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














