Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

GeForce GTX 485M SLI vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 485M SLI

2011Core: 575 MHz
Similar parts
····
Buy on Amazon
VS

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

2020
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

GeForce GTX 485M SLI vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Performance Spectrum

GeForce GTX 485M SLI
2 GB 100
3,360
0.0%
brand logoGeForce GTX 570M
brand logoGeForce GTX 745
brand logoGeForce GTX 950A
brand logoGeForce GTX 675MX
brand logoGeForce RTX 2050
brand logoGeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
brand logoGeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
brand logoGeForce RTX 5060
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
2 GB 30
3,390
+0.9%
brand logoRadeon R7 450
brand logoRadeon HD 6970M
brand logoRadeon HD 8770
brand logoRadeon HD 6990
brand logoGeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design
brand logoGeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
brand logoRadeon RX 6600 XT
brand logoGeForce RTX 5060

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 485M SLI vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 485M SLI

2011

Why buy it

  • ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 33.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • ❌233.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 30W.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

2020

Why buy it

  • ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • ✅GeForce GTX 485M SLI is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • ✅Draws 30W instead of 100W, a 70W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.9% in PassMark G3D (3,390 vs 3,360), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 10nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce GTX 485M SLI vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 485M SLI

The GeForce GTX 485M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 6 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 575 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,360 points.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. It has 96 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,390 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 485M SLI scores 3,360 and the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 reaches 3,390 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 485M SLI is built on Fermi while the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 40 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 485M SLI) vs 96 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7).

FeatureGeForce GTX 485M SLITiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
G3D Mark Score
3,360
3,390
Architecture
Fermi
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Process Node
40 nm
10 nm
Shading Units
768+700%
96
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 485M SLI gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 485M SLITiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 485M SLI and 64-bit on the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7.

FeatureGeForce GTX 485M SLITiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 485M SLI) vs 12.1 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.0 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 485M SLITiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12.1
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
OpenGL
4.0
4.6+15%
Max Displays
2
4+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 485M SLI) vs QuickSync (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 485M SLI) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,MPEG-2 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7).

FeatureGeForce GTX 485M SLITiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Encoder
PureVideo HD VP4
QuickSync
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP4
QuickSync
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 485M SLI draws 100W versus the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7's 30W — a 107.7% difference. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 485M SLI) vs 350W (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 92°C vs 85.

FeatureGeForce GTX 485M SLITiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
TDP
100W
30W-70%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
—
0mm
Height
—
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
92°C
85-8%
Perf/Watt
33.6
113.0+236%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 (2020 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce GTX 485M SLITiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
MSRP
—
$100
Codename
N11E-GTX-A1
Tiger Lake Xe
Release
January 6 2011
August 15 2020
Ranking
#542
#508
Search GeForce GTX 485M SLI on AmazonSearch Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.