GRID T4-1Q vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

GRID T4-1Q

2015Core: 557 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

2020Core: 400 MHzBoost: 1350 MHz
Similar parts
······

GRID T4-1Q vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID T4-1Q vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID T4-1Q

2015

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,880 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GRID T4-1Q is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 703.6% higher power demand at 225W vs 28W.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

2020

Why buy it

  • Draws 28W instead of 225W, a 197W reduction.
  • More future proof: Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) on 10nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2020 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,880 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.2% in PassMark G3D (3,311 vs 3,303), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GRID T4-1Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID T4-1Q makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GRID T4-1Q vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GRID T4-1Q

The GRID T4-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,303 points.

Intel

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 96 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 28W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.

Graphics Performance

The GRID T4-1Q scores 3,303 and the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs reaches 3,311 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID T4-1Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 28 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID T4-1Q) vs 96 (Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1350 MHz.

FeatureGRID T4-1QIris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
G3D Mark Score
3,303
3,311
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Process Node
28 nm
10 nm
Shading Units
2048+2033%
96
Boost Clock
1178 MHz
1350 MHz+15%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGRID T4-1QIris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID T4-1Q has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs carries 0 MB. GRID T4-1Q gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID T4-1Q and System on the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.

FeatureGRID T4-1QIris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Bus Width
64-bit
System
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_1 (GRID T4-1Q) vs 12.1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.

FeatureGRID T4-1QIris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
DirectX
12_1
12.1
Max Displays
0
4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID T4-1Q draws 225W versus the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs's 28W — a 155.7% difference. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID T4-1Q) vs 1W (Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.

FeatureGRID T4-1QIris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
TDP
225W
28W-88%
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Integrated
Length
1mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
14.7
118.3+705%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID T4-1Q came in at $1880, while the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs launched at $0. On MSRP, Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs was 100+% cheaper ($1880 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.8 (GRID T4-1Q) vs Infinity (Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs) — the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (2020 vs 2015).

FeatureGRID T4-1QIris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
MSRP
$1880
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
1.8
Infinity
Codename
GM204
Tiger Lake Xe
Release
August 30 2015
August 15 2020
Ranking
#525
#536

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.