GRID T4-1Q vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GRID T4-1Q vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
GRID T4-1Q vs Iris Xe Graphics G7: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GRID T4-1Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Iris Xe Graphics G7 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GRID T4-1Q is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌840% HIGHER MSRP$1,880 MSRPvs$200 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.8 vs 16.6 G3D/$ ($1,880 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ❌650% higher power demand at 225W vs 30W.
Iris Xe Graphics G7
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,680 less on MSRP ($200 MSRP vs $1,880 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 842.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.6 vs 1.8 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $1,880 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 225W, a 195W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2020 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID T4-1Q vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GRID T4-1Q
The GRID T4-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,303 points.
Iris Xe Graphics G7
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. It has 96 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID T4-1Q scores 3,303 and the Iris Xe Graphics G7 reaches 3,311 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID T4-1Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Iris Xe Graphics G7 uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 28 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID T4-1Q) vs 96 (Iris Xe Graphics G7).
| Feature | GRID T4-1Q | Iris Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,303 | 3,311 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+2033% | 96 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID T4-1Q | Iris Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID T4-1Q has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Xe Graphics G7 carries 0 MB. GRID T4-1Q gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID T4-1Q and System on the Iris Xe Graphics G7.
| Feature | GRID T4-1Q | Iris Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (GRID T4-1Q) vs 12.1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | GRID T4-1Q | Iris Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12.1 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID T4-1Q draws 225W versus the Iris Xe Graphics G7's 30W — a 152.9% difference. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID T4-1Q) vs 1W (Iris Xe Graphics G7). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | GRID T4-1Q | Iris Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 30W-87% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 14.7 | 110.4+651% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GRID T4-1Q came in at $1880, while the Iris Xe Graphics G7 launched at $200. On MSRP, Iris Xe Graphics G7 was 89.4% cheaper ($1680 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.8 (GRID T4-1Q) vs 16.6 (Iris Xe Graphics G7) — the Iris Xe Graphics G7 offers 822.2% better value. The newer card here is Iris Xe Graphics G7 (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | GRID T4-1Q | Iris Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1880 | $200-89% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.8 | 16.6+822% |
| Codename | GM204 | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Release | August 30 2015 | August 15 2020 |
| Ranking | #525 | #493 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID T4-1Q and Iris Xe Graphics G7
