GRID P100-8Q vs GRID T4-1Q

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID P100-8Q vs GRID T4-1Q FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID P100-8Q vs GRID T4-1Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID P100-8Q

2016

Why buy it

✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
292.2% HIGHER MSRP
$7,374 MSRPvs$1,880 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.4 vs 1.8 G3D/$ ($7,374 MSRP vs $1,880 MSRP).

GRID T4-1Q

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $5,494 less on MSRP ($1,880 MSRP vs $7,374 MSRP).
✅Delivers 296.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.8 vs 0.4 G3D/$ ($1,880 MSRP vs $7,374 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID T4-1Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.1% in PassMark G3D (3,303 vs 3,267), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID P100-8Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2016 generation instead of 2015. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GRID T4-1Q makes the most sense to buy today. It is $5,494 cheaper on MSRP at $1,880 vs $7,374, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 296.6% (1.8 vs 0.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GRID T4-1Q is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GRID P100-8Q has the stronger long-term case.

GRID P100-8Q vs GRID T4-1Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID P100-8Q

The GRID P100-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,267 points.

GRID T4-1Q

The GRID T4-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,303 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID P100-8Q scores 3,267 and the GRID T4-1Q reaches 3,303 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P100-8Q is built on Maxwell while the GRID T4-1Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (GRID P100-8Q) vs 2,048 (GRID T4-1Q). Raw compute: 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID P100-8Q) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID T4-1Q). Boost clocks: 1306 MHz vs 1178 MHz.

Feature	GRID P100-8Q	GRID T4-1Q
G3D Mark Score	3,267	3,303+1%
Architecture	Maxwell	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	640	2048+220%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.672 TFLOPS	4.825 TFLOPS+189%
Boost Clock	1306 MHz+11%	1178 MHz
ROPs	16	64+300%
TMUs	40	128+220%
L1 Cache	320 KB	768 KB+140%
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID P100-8Q	GRID T4-1Q
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID P100-8Q and 64-bit on the GRID T4-1Q.

Feature	GRID P100-8Q	GRID T4-1Q
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID P100-8Q draws 225W versus the GRID T4-1Q's 225W — a 0% difference. The GRID T4-1Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P100-8Q) vs 350W (GRID T4-1Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GRID P100-8Q	GRID T4-1Q
TDP	225W	225W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	1mm
Slots	—	0
Perf/Watt	14.5	14.7+1%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID P100-8Q came in at $7374, while the GRID T4-1Q launched at $1880. On MSRP, GRID T4-1Q was 74.5% cheaper ($5494 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.4 (GRID P100-8Q) vs 1.8 (GRID T4-1Q) — the GRID T4-1Q offers 350% better value. The newer card here is GRID P100-8Q (2016 vs 2015).

Feature	GRID P100-8Q	GRID T4-1Q
MSRP	$7374	$1880-75%
Performance per Dollar	0.4	1.8+350%
Codename	GM107	GM204
Release	May 18 2016	August 30 2015
Ranking	#622	#525

Search GRID P100-8Q on Amazon

Search GRID T4-1Q on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.