GeForce GT 755M SLI vs GRID P100-8Q
GeForce GT 755M SLI
Popular choices:
GRID P100-8Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 755M SLI is positioned at rank 285 and the GRID P100-8Q is on rank 384, so the GeForce GT 755M SLI offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 755M SLI
Performance Per Dollar GRID P100-8Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GT 755M SLI is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID P100-8Q.
| Insight | GeForce GT 755M SLI | GRID P100-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GT 755M SLI offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GT 755M SLI holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $550), it costs 91% less, resulting in a 1004.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GT 755M SLI | GRID P100-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1004.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($550) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 755M SLI and GRID P100-8Q
GeForce GT 755M SLI
The GeForce GT 755M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 980 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 2W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,280 points.
GRID P100-8Q
The GRID P100-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,267 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 755M SLI scores 3,280 and the GRID P100-8Q reaches 3,267 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 755M SLI is built on Kepler while the GRID P100-8Q uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GT 755M SLI) vs 640 (GRID P100-8Q).
| Feature | GeForce GT 755M SLI | GRID P100-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,280 | 3,267 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+20% | 640 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 755M SLI | GRID P100-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GT 755M SLI | GRID P100-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 755M SLI draws 2W versus the GRID P100-8Q's 225W — a 196.5% difference. The GeForce GT 755M SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 755M SLI) vs 350W (GRID P100-8Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GT 755M SLI | GRID P100-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 2W-99% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 1640.0+11210% | 14.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GT 755M SLI launched at $200 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the GRID P100-8Q launched at $7374 and now averages $550. The GeForce GT 755M SLI costs 90.9% less ($500 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 65.6 (GeForce GT 755M SLI) vs 5.9 (GRID P100-8Q) — the GeForce GT 755M SLI offers 1011.9% better value. The GRID P100-8Q is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GT 755M SLI | GRID P100-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200-97% | $7374 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-91% | $550 |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.6+1012% | 5.9 |
| Codename | N14P-? | GM107 |
| Release | November 1 2013 | May 18 2016 |
| Ranking | #554 | #622 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GT 755M SLI and GRID P100-8Q
