GeForce GT 755M SLI vs GeForce GTX 675M SLI

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 755M SLI vs GeForce GTX 675M SLI FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 755M SLI vs GeForce GTX 675M SLI: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 755M SLI

2013

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 675M SLI across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GeForce GTX 675M SLI

2011

Why buy it

✅11.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 16.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $200 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 675M SLI is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 11.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.9% in PassMark G3D (3,311 vs 3,280), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GT 755M SLI is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2013 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GT 755M SLI makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. GeForce GTX 675M SLI still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GT 755M SLI vs GeForce GTX 675M SLI Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 755M SLI

The GeForce GT 755M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 980 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 2W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,280 points.

GeForce GTX 675M SLI

The GeForce GTX 675M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 6 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 620 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 2W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 755M SLI scores 3,280 and the GeForce GTX 675M SLI reaches 3,311 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 755M SLI is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 675M SLI uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GT 755M SLI) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 675M SLI).

Feature	GeForce GT 755M SLI	GeForce GTX 675M SLI
G3D Mark Score	3,280	3,311
Architecture	Kepler	Fermi
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	768	768

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GT 755M SLI	GeForce GTX 675M SLI
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 755M SLI and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 675M SLI.

Feature	GeForce GT 755M SLI	GeForce GTX 675M SLI
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 755M SLI) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 675M SLI). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.1 vs 4.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce GT 755M SLI	GeForce GTX 675M SLI
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Vulkan	1.2	1.2
OpenGL	4.1+2%	4.0
Max Displays	4+100%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (1st Gen) (GeForce GT 755M SLI) vs PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 675M SLI). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 755M SLI) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 675M SLI).

Feature	GeForce GT 755M SLI	GeForce GTX 675M SLI
Encoder	NVENC (1st Gen)	PureVideo HD VP4
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP5	PureVideo HD VP4
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 755M SLI draws 2W versus the GeForce GTX 675M SLI's 2W — a 0% difference. The GeForce GTX 675M SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 755M SLI) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 675M SLI). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 92°C.

Feature	GeForce GT 755M SLI	GeForce GTX 675M SLI
TDP	2W	2W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	90°C-2%	92°C
Perf/Watt	1640.0	1655.5

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GT 755M SLI (2013 vs 2011).

Feature	GeForce GT 755M SLI	GeForce GTX 675M SLI
MSRP	$200	—
Codename	N14P-?	N12E-GTX2
Release	November 1 2013	January 6 2011
Ranking	#554	#557

Search GeForce GT 755M SLI on Amazon

Search GeForce GTX 675M SLI on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.