GeForce GT 755M SLI vs UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 755M SLI

2013Core: 980 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)

2021
Similar parts
······

GeForce GT 755M SLI vs UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 755M SLI vs UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 755M SLI

2013

Why buy it

  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
  • Draws 2W instead of 15W, a 13W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 300% HIGHER MSRP
    $200 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 16.4 vs 66.2 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)

2021

Why buy it

  • Costs $150 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
  • Delivers 303.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 66.2 vs 16.4 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
  • More future proof: Unknown architecture on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2021 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 650% higher power demand at 15W vs 2W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.9% in PassMark G3D (3,311 vs 3,280), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GT 755M SLI is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) makes the most sense to buy today. It is $150 cheaper on MSRP at $50 vs $200, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 303.8% (66.2 vs 16.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p, UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GT 755M SLI has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GT 755M SLI vs UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 755M SLI

The GeForce GT 755M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 980 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 2W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,280 points.

Intel

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)

The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2021. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 755M SLI scores 3,280 and the UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) reaches 3,311 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance.

FeatureGeForce GT 755M SLIUHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
G3D Mark Score
3,280
3,311
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 755M SLI gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GT 755M SLIUHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 755M SLI has 2 GB of VRAM, while the UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) carries 0 MB. GeForce GT 755M SLI gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 755M SLI and System on the UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake).

FeatureGeForce GT 755M SLIUHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
System
Bus Width
64-bit
System
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 755M SLI draws 2W versus the UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)'s 15W — a 152.9% difference. The GeForce GT 755M SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 755M SLI) vs 1W (UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.

FeatureGeForce GT 755M SLIUHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
TDP
2W-87%
15W
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Integrated
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
90°C
Perf/Watt
1640.0+643%
220.7
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 755M SLI came in at $200, while the UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) launched at $50. On MSRP, UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) was 75% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 16.4 (GeForce GT 755M SLI) vs 66.2 (UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)) — the UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) offers 303.7% better value. The newer card here is UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) (2021 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GT 755M SLIUHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
MSRP
$200
$50-75%
Performance per Dollar
16.4
66.2+304%
Codename
N14P-?
Rocket Lake GT1
Release
November 1 2013
March 30 2021
Ranking
#554
#432

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.