GeForce GT 755M SLI
VS
Iris Graphics 550

GeForce GT 755M SLI vs Iris Graphics 550

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 755M SLI

2013Core: 980 MHz
VS
Intel

Iris Graphics 550

2015Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1000 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce GT 755M SLI is positioned at rank #285 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 755M SLI

#61
GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)
MSRP: $800|Avg: $350
94%
#275
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
662%
#277
600%
#278
599%
#282
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
544%
#283
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
541%
#285
GeForce GT 755M SLI
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
100%
#286
GeForce GTX 950A
MSRP: $159|Avg: $30
100%
#288
Radeon 540X
MSRP: $99|Avg: $40
98%
#289
GeForce 930MX
MSRP: $80|Avg: $25
97%
#291
GeForce MX250
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
97%
#292
Radeon 630
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
96%
#293
GeForce MX330
MSRP: $150|Avg: $100
96%
#296
Radeon RX 780
MSRP: $499|Avg: $721
94%
#300
GeForce 940MX
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Iris Graphics 550 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GT 755M SLI offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightGeForce GT 755M SLIIris Graphics 550
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%)
Leading raw performance (+0.9%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Generation 9.0 (2015−2016))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Iris Graphics 550 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 755M SLI and Iris Graphics 550

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 755M SLI

The GeForce GT 755M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 980 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 2W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,280 points.

Intel

Iris Graphics 550

The Iris Graphics 550 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 755M SLI scores 3,280 and the Iris Graphics 550 reaches 3,311 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 755M SLI is built on Kepler while the Iris Graphics 550 uses Generation 9.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm+. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GT 755M SLI) vs 384 (Iris Graphics 550).

FeatureGeForce GT 755M SLIIris Graphics 550
G3D Mark Score
3,280
3,311
Architecture
Kepler
Generation 9.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm+
Shading Units
768+100%
384

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GT 755M SLIIris Graphics 550
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 755M SLI comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Graphics 550 has 0 MB. The GeForce GT 755M SLI offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.

FeatureGeForce GT 755M SLIIris Graphics 550
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
System
Bus Width
64-bit
System
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 755M SLI) vs 12 (12_1) (Iris Graphics 550). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.1 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

FeatureGeForce GT 755M SLIIris Graphics 550
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_1)
Vulkan
1.2
1.3+8%
OpenGL
4.1
4.6+12%
Max Displays
4+33%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (1st Gen) (GeForce GT 755M SLI) vs Quick Sync Video (Iris Graphics 550). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs Quick Sync Video. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 755M SLI) vs H.264,H.265,VP8,VP9,JPEG (Iris Graphics 550).

FeatureGeForce GT 755M SLIIris Graphics 550
Encoder
NVENC (1st Gen)
Quick Sync Video
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP5
Quick Sync Video
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,H.265,VP8,VP9,JPEG
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 755M SLI draws 2W versus the Iris Graphics 550's 15W — a 152.9% difference. The GeForce GT 755M SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 755M SLI) vs 1W (Iris Graphics 550). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.

FeatureGeForce GT 755M SLIIris Graphics 550
TDP
2W-87%
15W
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Integrated
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
90°C
Perf/Watt
1640.0+643%
220.7
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GT 755M SLI launched at $200 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Iris Graphics 550 launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Iris Graphics 550 costs 100+% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 65.6 (GeForce GT 755M SLI) vs Infinity (Iris Graphics 550) — the Iris Graphics 550 offers Infinity% better value. The Iris Graphics 550 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GT 755M SLIIris Graphics 550
MSRP
$200
$0-100%
Avg Price (30d)
$50
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
65.6
Infinity
Codename
N14P-?
Skylake GT3e
Release
November 1 2013
September 1 2015
Ranking
#554
#775