GeForce GT 755M SLI
VS
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

GeForce GT 755M SLI vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 755M SLI

2013Core: 980 MHz

Popular choices:

RTX 4060•RTX 3060•RTX 4060 Ti•RTX 3070•GTX 1650•RTX 3060 Ti•RTX 4070•RTX 3050•RX 7600•RTX 4070 Ti
VS
Intel

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

2020Core: 400 MHzBoost: 1350 MHz

Popular choices:

RTX 4060•RTX 3060•RTX 4060 Ti•RTX 3070•GTX 1650•RTX 3060 Ti•RTX 4070•RTX 3050•RX 7600•RTX 4070 Ti

Performance Spectrum - GPU

GeForce GT 755M SLI
2
3,280
0.0%
brand logoGeForce MX230
brand logoGeForce GTX 745
brand logoGeForce GTX 470M SLI
brand logoGeForce MX350
brand logoGeForce RTX 2050
brand logoGeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
brand logoGeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
brand logoGeForce RTX 5060
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
28
3,311
+0.9%
brand logoHD Graphics 630
brand logoIris Plus Graphics 645
brand logoIris Plus Graphics 950
brand logoUHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
brand logoUHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)
brand logoIris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
brand logoArc A530M
brand logoArc A580

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce GT 755M SLI is positioned at rank #285 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 755M SLI

#61
GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)
MSRP: $800|Avg: $350
94%
#275
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
662%
#277
GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150
600%
#278
GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100
599%
#282
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
544%
#283
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
541%
#285
GeForce GT 755M SLI
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
100%
#286
GeForce GTX 950A
MSRP: $159|Avg: $30
100%
#288
Radeon 540X
MSRP: $99|Avg: $40
98%
#289
GeForce 930MX
MSRP: $80|Avg: $25
97%
#291
GeForce MX250
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
97%
#292
Radeon 630
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
96%
#293
GeForce MX330
MSRP: $150|Avg: $100
96%
#296
Radeon RX 780
MSRP: $499|Avg: $721
94%
#300
GeForce 940MX
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is significantly newer (2020 vs 2013). The Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GT 755M SLI lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GT 755M SLI offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightGeForce GT 755M SLIIris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Performance
❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%)
✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) (10nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
—
—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GT 755M SLI Benchmark Check

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080p
low63 FPS
medium37 FPS
high33 FPS
ultra26 FPS
1440p
low33 FPS
medium19 FPS
high17 FPS
ultra13 FPS
4K
low12 FPS
medium8 FPS
high7 FPS
ultra5 FPS
Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080p
low149 FPS
medium119 FPS
high99 FPS
ultra74 FPS
1440p
low95 FPS
medium65 FPS
high53 FPS
ultra36 FPS
4K
low31 FPS
medium24 FPS
high21 FPS
ultra13 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080p
low148 FPS
medium101 FPS
high62 FPS
ultra32 FPS
1440p
low65 FPS
medium50 FPS
high26 FPS
ultra16 FPS
4K
low22 FPS
medium16 FPS
high9 FPS
ultra7 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080p
low149 FPS
medium119 FPS
high70 FPS
ultra40 FPS
1440p
low103 FPS
medium81 FPS
high43 FPS
ultra28 FPS
4K
low52 FPS
medium40 FPS
high22 FPS
ultra16 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080p
low148 FPS
medium118 FPS
high98 FPS
ultra74 FPS
1440p
low111 FPS
medium89 FPS
high74 FPS
ultra55 FPS
4K
low74 FPS
medium59 FPS
high49 FPS
ultra37 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080p
low149 FPS
medium119 FPS
high99 FPS
ultra74 FPS
1440p
low112 FPS
medium89 FPS
high74 FPS
ultra56 FPS
4K
low74 FPS
medium60 FPS
high50 FPS
ultra37 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080p
low55 FPS
medium37 FPS
high29 FPS
ultra16 FPS
1440p
low18 FPS
medium12 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra7 FPS
4K
low14 FPS
medium9 FPS
high7 FPS
ultra5 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080p
low109 FPS
medium92 FPS
high72 FPS
ultra46 FPS
1440p
low74 FPS
medium64 FPS
high48 FPS
ultra31 FPS
4K
low48 FPS
medium40 FPS
high25 FPS
ultra16 FPS
Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 755M SLI and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 755M SLI

The GeForce GT 755M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 980 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 2W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,280 points.

Intel

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 96 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 28W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 755M SLI scores 3,280 and the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs reaches 3,311 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 755M SLI is built on Kepler while the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 28 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GT 755M SLI) vs 96 (Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs).

FeatureGeForce GT 755M SLIIris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
G3D Mark Score
3,280
3,311
Architecture
Kepler
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Process Node
28 nm
10 nm
Shading Units
768+700%
96
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GT 755M SLIIris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 755M SLI comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs has 0 MB. The GeForce GT 755M SLI offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.

FeatureGeForce GT 755M SLIIris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
System
Bus Width
64-bit
System
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 755M SLI) vs 12.1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.1 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GT 755M SLIIris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12.1
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
OpenGL
4.1
4.6+12%
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (1st Gen) (GeForce GT 755M SLI) vs QuickSync (Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 755M SLI) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs).

FeatureGeForce GT 755M SLIIris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Encoder
NVENC (1st Gen)
QuickSync
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP5
QuickSync
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,HEVC,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 755M SLI draws 2W versus the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs's 28W — a 173.3% difference. The GeForce GT 755M SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 755M SLI) vs 1W (Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 85°C.

FeatureGeForce GT 755M SLIIris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
TDP
2W-93%
28W
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Integrated
Slots
0
—
Temp (Load)
90°C
85°C-6%
Perf/Watt
1640.0+1286%
118.3
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GT 755M SLI launched at $200 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs costs 100+% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 65.6 (GeForce GT 755M SLI) vs Infinity (Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs) — the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs offers Infinity% better value. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GT 755M SLIIris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
MSRP
$200
$0-100%
Avg Price (30d)
$50
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
65.6
Infinity
Codename
N14P-?
Tiger Lake Xe
Release
November 1 2013
August 15 2020
Ranking
#554
#536