GeForce GT 755M SLI
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
GeForce GT 755M SLI vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GT 755M SLI vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
GeForce GT 755M SLI vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GT 755M SLI
2013Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GT 755M SLI is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 28W, a 26W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
2020Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) on 10nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2020 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 16.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ❌1300% higher power demand at 28W vs 2W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 755M SLI vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GT 755M SLI
The GeForce GT 755M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 980 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 2W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,280 points.
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 96 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 28W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 755M SLI scores 3,280 and the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs reaches 3,311 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 755M SLI is built on Kepler while the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 28 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GT 755M SLI) vs 96 (Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs).
| Feature | GeForce GT 755M SLI | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,280 | 3,311 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+700% | 96 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GT 755M SLI gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GT 755M SLI | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 755M SLI has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs carries 0 MB. GeForce GT 755M SLI gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 755M SLI and System on the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
| Feature | GeForce GT 755M SLI | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 755M SLI) vs 12.1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.1 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GT 755M SLI | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.6+12% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (1st Gen) (GeForce GT 755M SLI) vs QuickSync (Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 755M SLI) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs).
| Feature | GeForce GT 755M SLI | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (1st Gen) | QuickSync |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP5 | QuickSync |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 755M SLI draws 2W versus the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs's 28W — a 173.3% difference. The GeForce GT 755M SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 755M SLI) vs 1W (Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GT 755M SLI | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 2W-93% | 28W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C | 85°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 1640.0+1286% | 118.3 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GT 755M SLI came in at $200, while the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs launched at $0. On MSRP, Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs was 100+% cheaper ($200 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 16.4 (GeForce GT 755M SLI) vs Infinity (Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs) — the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (2020 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GT 755M SLI | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.4 | Infinity |
| Codename | N14P-? | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Release | November 1 2013 | August 15 2020 |
| Ranking | #554 | #536 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GT 755M SLI and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
