GeForce GT 755M SLI vs GRID T4-1Q

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 755M SLI

2013Core: 980 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS

GRID T4-1Q

2015Core: 557 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GT 755M SLI vs GRID T4-1Q Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 755M SLI vs GRID T4-1Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 755M SLI

2013

Why buy it

  • Costs $1,680 less on MSRP ($200 MSRP vs $1,880 MSRP).
  • Delivers 833.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.4 vs 1.8 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $1,880 MSRP).
  • Draws 2W instead of 225W, a 223W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GRID T4-1Q

2015

Why buy it

  • More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 840% HIGHER MSRP
    $1,880 MSRPvs$200 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.8 vs 16.4 G3D/$ ($1,880 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
  • 11150% higher power demand at 225W vs 2W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GRID T4-1Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.7% in PassMark G3D (3,303 vs 3,280), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GT 755M SLI is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 755M SLI makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,680 cheaper on MSRP at $200 vs $1,880, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 833.5% (16.4 vs 1.8), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. GRID T4-1Q still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GT 755M SLI vs GRID T4-1Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 755M SLI

The GeForce GT 755M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 980 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 2W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,280 points.

NVIDIA

GRID T4-1Q

The GRID T4-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,303 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 755M SLI scores 3,280 and the GRID T4-1Q reaches 3,303 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 755M SLI is built on Kepler while the GRID T4-1Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GT 755M SLI) vs 2,048 (GRID T4-1Q).

FeatureGeForce GT 755M SLIGRID T4-1Q
G3D Mark Score
3,280
3,303
Architecture
Kepler
Maxwell 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
768
2048+167%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 755M SLI gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID T4-1Q leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GT 755M SLIGRID T4-1Q
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 755M SLI and 64-bit on the GRID T4-1Q.

FeatureGeForce GT 755M SLIGRID T4-1Q
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 755M SLI) vs 12_1 (GRID T4-1Q). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

FeatureGeForce GT 755M SLIGRID T4-1Q
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12_1
Max Displays
4
0
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 755M SLI draws 2W versus the GRID T4-1Q's 225W — a 196.5% difference. The GeForce GT 755M SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 755M SLI) vs 350W (GRID T4-1Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GT 755M SLIGRID T4-1Q
TDP
2W-99%
225W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
1mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
90°C
Perf/Watt
1640.0+11056%
14.7
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 755M SLI came in at $200, while the GRID T4-1Q launched at $1880. On MSRP, GeForce GT 755M SLI was 89.4% cheaper ($1680 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 16.4 (GeForce GT 755M SLI) vs 1.8 (GRID T4-1Q) — the GeForce GT 755M SLI offers 811.1% better value. The newer card here is GRID T4-1Q (2015 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GT 755M SLIGRID T4-1Q
MSRP
$200-89%
$1880
Performance per Dollar
16.4+811%
1.8
Codename
N14P-?
GM204
Release
November 1 2013
August 30 2015
Ranking
#554
#525

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.