
GeForce GT 755M SLI vs GRID T4-1Q

GeForce GT 755M SLI
Popular choices:

GRID T4-1Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 755M SLI is positioned at rank 285 and the GRID T4-1Q is on rank 304, so the GeForce GT 755M SLI offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 755M SLI
Performance Per Dollar GRID T4-1Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID T4-1Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GT 755M SLI.
| Insight | GeForce GT 755M SLI | GRID T4-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GT 755M SLI offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GT 755M SLI holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $600), it costs 92% less, resulting in a 1091.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GT 755M SLI | GRID T4-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1091.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($600) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 755M SLI and GRID T4-1Q

GeForce GT 755M SLI
The GeForce GT 755M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 980 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 2W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,280 points.

GRID T4-1Q
The GRID T4-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,303 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 755M SLI scores 3,280 and the GRID T4-1Q reaches 3,303 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 755M SLI is built on Kepler while the GRID T4-1Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GT 755M SLI) vs 2,048 (GRID T4-1Q).
| Feature | GeForce GT 755M SLI | GRID T4-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,280 | 3,303 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 2048+167% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 755M SLI | GRID T4-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GT 755M SLI | GRID T4-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 755M SLI) vs 12_1 (GRID T4-1Q). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GT 755M SLI | GRID T4-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 755M SLI draws 2W versus the GRID T4-1Q's 225W — a 196.5% difference. The GeForce GT 755M SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 755M SLI) vs 350W (GRID T4-1Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GT 755M SLI | GRID T4-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 2W-99% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 1640.0+11056% | 14.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GT 755M SLI launched at $200 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the GRID T4-1Q launched at $1880 and now averages $600. The GeForce GT 755M SLI costs 91.7% less ($550 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 65.6 (GeForce GT 755M SLI) vs 5.5 (GRID T4-1Q) — the GeForce GT 755M SLI offers 1092.7% better value. The GRID T4-1Q is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GT 755M SLI | GRID T4-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200-89% | $1880 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-92% | $600 |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.6+1093% | 5.5 |
| Codename | N14P-? | GM204 |
| Release | November 1 2013 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #554 | #525 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















