GeForce GT 755M SLI vs P102-100

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 755M SLI vs P102-100 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 755M SLI vs P102-100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 755M SLI

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $400 less on MSRP ($200 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
✅Delivers 198.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.4 vs 5.5 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
✅Draws 2W instead of 250W, a 248W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

P102-100

2018

Why buy it

✅GeForce GT 755M SLI is already obsolete for modern gaming, so P102-100 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 16nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2018 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌
200% HIGHER MSRP
$600 MSRPvs$200 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.5 vs 16.4 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
❌12400% higher power demand at 250W vs 2W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

P102-100 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.6% in PassMark G3D (3,301 vs 3,280), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

P102-100 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 16nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2018 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GT 755M SLI makes the most sense to buy today. It is $400 cheaper on MSRP at $200 vs $600, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 198.1% (16.4 vs 5.5), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GT 755M SLI is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, P102-100 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GT 755M SLI vs P102-100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 755M SLI

The GeForce GT 755M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 980 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 2W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,280 points.

P102-100

The P102-100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 12 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1582 MHz to 1683 MHz. It has 3200 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,301 points. Launch price was $599.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 755M SLI scores 3,280 and the P102-100 reaches 3,301 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 755M SLI is built on Kepler while the P102-100 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GT 755M SLI) vs 3,200 (P102-100).

Feature	GeForce GT 755M SLI	P102-100
G3D Mark Score	3,280	3,301
Architecture	Kepler	Pascal
Process Node	28 nm	16 nm
Shading Units	768	3200+317%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 755M SLI gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The P102-100 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GT 755M SLI	P102-100
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 755M SLI and 64-bit on the P102-100.

Feature	GeForce GT 755M SLI	P102-100
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 755M SLI) vs 12_1 (P102-100). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce GT 755M SLI	P102-100
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12_1
Max Displays	4	0

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 755M SLI draws 2W versus the P102-100's 250W — a 196.8% difference. The GeForce GT 755M SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 755M SLI) vs 350W (P102-100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GT 755M SLI	P102-100
TDP	2W-99%	250W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	267mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	90°C	—
Perf/Watt	1640.0+12324%	13.2

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 755M SLI came in at $200, while the P102-100 launched at $600. On MSRP, GeForce GT 755M SLI was 66.7% cheaper ($400 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 16.4 (GeForce GT 755M SLI) vs 5.5 (P102-100) — the GeForce GT 755M SLI offers 198.2% better value. The newer card here is P102-100 (2018 vs 2013).

Feature	GeForce GT 755M SLI	P102-100
MSRP	$200-67%	$600
Performance per Dollar	16.4+198%	5.5
Codename	N14P-?	GP102
Release	November 1 2013	February 12 2018
Ranking	#554	#560

Search GeForce GT 755M SLI on Amazon

Search P102-100 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.