GRID P100-8Q vs Iris Graphics 550

GRID P100-8Q

2016Core: 1033 MHzBoost: 1306 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Iris Graphics 550

2015Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1000 MHz
Similar parts
······

GRID P100-8Q vs Iris Graphics 550 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID P100-8Q vs Iris Graphics 550: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID P100-8Q

2016

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($7,374 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
  • Iris Graphics 550 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GRID P100-8Q is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 1400% higher power demand at 225W vs 15W.

Iris Graphics 550

2015

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 225W, a 210W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2015 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $7,374 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Iris Graphics 550 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.3% in PassMark G3D (3,311 vs 3,267), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GRID P100-8Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs Unknown of VRAM and a newer 2016 generation instead of 2015. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID P100-8Q makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Iris Graphics 550 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GRID P100-8Q vs Iris Graphics 550 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GRID P100-8Q

The GRID P100-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,267 points.

Intel

Iris Graphics 550

The Iris Graphics 550 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.

Graphics Performance

The GRID P100-8Q scores 3,267 and the Iris Graphics 550 reaches 3,311 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P100-8Q is built on Maxwell while the Iris Graphics 550 uses Generation 9.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm+. Shader units: 640 (GRID P100-8Q) vs 384 (Iris Graphics 550). Raw compute: 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID P100-8Q) vs 0.768 TFLOPS (Iris Graphics 550). Boost clocks: 1306 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

FeatureGRID P100-8QIris Graphics 550
G3D Mark Score
3,267
3,311+1%
Architecture
Maxwell
Generation 9.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm+
Shading Units
640+67%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.672 TFLOPS+118%
0.768 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1306 MHz+31%
1000 MHz
ROPs
16+167%
6
TMUs
40
48+20%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGRID P100-8QIris Graphics 550
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID P100-8Q has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Graphics 550 carries 0 MB. GRID P100-8Q gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID P100-8Q and System on the Iris Graphics 550.

FeatureGRID P100-8QIris Graphics 550
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Bus Width
64-bit
System
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID P100-8Q draws 225W versus the Iris Graphics 550's 15W — a 175% difference. The Iris Graphics 550 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P100-8Q) vs 1W (Iris Graphics 550). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.

FeatureGRID P100-8QIris Graphics 550
TDP
225W
15W-93%
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Integrated
Perf/Watt
14.5
220.7+1422%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID P100-8Q came in at $7374, while the Iris Graphics 550 launched at $0. On MSRP, Iris Graphics 550 was 100+% cheaper ($7374 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.4 (GRID P100-8Q) vs Infinity (Iris Graphics 550) — the Iris Graphics 550 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is GRID P100-8Q (2016 vs 2015).

FeatureGRID P100-8QIris Graphics 550
MSRP
$7374
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
0.4
Infinity
Codename
GM107
Skylake GT3e
Release
May 18 2016
September 1 2015
Ranking
#622
#775

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.