GRID P100-8Q vs P102-100

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID P100-8Q vs P102-100 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID P100-8Q vs P102-100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID P100-8Q

2016

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
1129% HIGHER MSRP
$7,374 MSRPvs$600 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.4 vs 5.5 G3D/$ ($7,374 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).

P102-100

2018

Why buy it

✅Costs $6,774 less on MSRP ($600 MSRP vs $7,374 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1141.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.5 vs 0.4 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs $7,374 MSRP).
✅GRID P100-8Q is already obsolete for modern gaming, so P102-100 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌2018 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

P102-100 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1% in PassMark G3D (3,301 vs 3,267), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

P102-100 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 16nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2018 generation instead of 2016. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

P102-100 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $6,774 cheaper on MSRP at $600 vs $7,374, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1141.8% (5.5 vs 0.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GRID P100-8Q vs P102-100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID P100-8Q

The GRID P100-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,267 points.

P102-100

The P102-100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 12 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1582 MHz to 1683 MHz. It has 3200 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,301 points. Launch price was $599.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID P100-8Q scores 3,267 and the P102-100 reaches 3,301 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P100-8Q is built on Maxwell while the P102-100 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 640 (GRID P100-8Q) vs 3,200 (P102-100). Raw compute: 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID P100-8Q) vs 10.77 TFLOPS (P102-100). Boost clocks: 1306 MHz vs 1683 MHz.

Feature	GRID P100-8Q	P102-100
G3D Mark Score	3,267	3,301+1%
Architecture	Maxwell	Pascal
Process Node	28 nm	16 nm
Shading Units	640	3200+400%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.672 TFLOPS	10.77 TFLOPS+544%
Boost Clock	1306 MHz	1683 MHz+29%
ROPs	16	80+400%
TMUs	40	200+400%
L1 Cache	0.31 MB	1.2 MB+287%
L2 Cache	2 MB	2.5 MB+25%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID P100-8Q	P102-100
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID P100-8Q and 64-bit on the P102-100. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID P100-8Q) vs 2.5 MB (P102-100) — the P102-100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID P100-8Q	P102-100
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	2.5 MB+25%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID P100-8Q draws 225W versus the P102-100's 250W — a 10.5% difference. The GRID P100-8Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P100-8Q) vs 350W (P102-100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GRID P100-8Q	P102-100
TDP	225W-10%	250W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	267mm
Slots	—	2
Perf/Watt	14.5+10%	13.2

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID P100-8Q came in at $7374, while the P102-100 launched at $600. On MSRP, P102-100 was 91.9% cheaper ($6774 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.4 (GRID P100-8Q) vs 5.5 (P102-100) — the P102-100 offers 1275% better value. The newer card here is P102-100 (2018 vs 2016).

Feature	GRID P100-8Q	P102-100
MSRP	$7374	$600-92%
Performance per Dollar	0.4	5.5+1275%
Codename	GM107	GP102
Release	May 18 2016	February 12 2018
Ranking	#622	#560

Search GRID P100-8Q on Amazon

Search P102-100 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.