
GRID T4-1Q vs UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)

GRID T4-1Q
Popular choices:

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID T4-1Q is positioned at rank 304 and the UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is on rank 37, so the UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID T4-1Q
Performance Per Dollar UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is significantly newer (2021 vs 2015). The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GRID T4-1Q lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GRID T4-1Q offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GRID T4-1Q | UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | Rocket Lake GT1 (14nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $50 versus $600 for the GRID T4-1Q, it costs 92% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 1102.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID T4-1Q | UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1102.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($600) | ✅More affordable ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID T4-1Q and UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)

GRID T4-1Q
The GRID T4-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,303 points.

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2021. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID T4-1Q scores 3,303 and the UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) reaches 3,311 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance.
| Feature | GRID T4-1Q | UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,303 | 3,311 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID T4-1Q | UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID T4-1Q comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) has 0 MB. The GRID T4-1Q offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | GRID T4-1Q | UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID T4-1Q draws 225W versus the UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)'s 15W — a 175% difference. The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID T4-1Q) vs 1W (UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | GRID T4-1Q | UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 15W-93% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 14.7 | 220.7+1401% |
Value Analysis
The GRID T4-1Q launched at $1880 MSRP and currently averages $600, while the UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) launched at $50 and now averages $50. The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) costs 91.7% less ($550 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.5 (GRID T4-1Q) vs 66.2 (UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)) — the UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) offers 1103.6% better value. The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2015).
| Feature | GRID T4-1Q | UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1880 | $50-97% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $600 | $50-92% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.5 | 66.2+1104% |
| Codename | GM204 | Rocket Lake GT1 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | March 30 2021 |
| Ranking | #525 | #432 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















