GRID T4-1Q vs HD Graphics 530
GRID T4-1Q
Popular choices:
HD Graphics 530
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GRID T4-1Q is positioned at rank #304 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID T4-1Q
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The HD Graphics 530 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GRID T4-1Q offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GRID T4-1Q | HD Graphics 530 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Generation 9.0 (2015−2016)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the HD Graphics 530 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID T4-1Q and HD Graphics 530
GRID T4-1Q
The GRID T4-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,303 points.
HD Graphics 530
The HD Graphics 530 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID T4-1Q scores 3,303 and the HD Graphics 530 reaches 3,311 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID T4-1Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the HD Graphics 530 uses Generation 9.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm+. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID T4-1Q) vs 192 (HD Graphics 530). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID T4-1Q) vs 0.3648 TFLOPS (HD Graphics 530). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 950 MHz.
| Feature | GRID T4-1Q | HD Graphics 530 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,303 | 3,311 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Generation 9.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm+ |
| Shading Units | 2048+967% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS+1223% | 0.3648 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz+24% | 950 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+2033% | 3 |
| TMUs | 128+433% | 24 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID T4-1Q | HD Graphics 530 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID T4-1Q comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the HD Graphics 530 has 0 MB. The GRID T4-1Q offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | GRID T4-1Q | HD Graphics 530 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (GRID T4-1Q) vs 12 (HD Graphics 530). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.
| Feature | GRID T4-1Q | HD Graphics 530 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 3 |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID T4-1Q draws 225W versus the HD Graphics 530's 15W — a 175% difference. The HD Graphics 530 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID T4-1Q) vs 1W (HD Graphics 530). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | GRID T4-1Q | HD Graphics 530 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 15W-93% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 14.7 | 220.7+1401% |
Value Analysis
The GRID T4-1Q launched at $1880 MSRP and currently averages $600, while the HD Graphics 530 launched at $0 and now averages $0. The HD Graphics 530 costs 100+% less ($600 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.5 (GRID T4-1Q) vs Infinity (HD Graphics 530) — the HD Graphics 530 offers Infinity% better value.
| Feature | GRID T4-1Q | HD Graphics 530 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1880 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $600 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.5 | Infinity |
| Codename | GM204 | Skylake GT2 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | September 1 2015 |
| Ranking | #525 | #887 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID T4-1Q and HD Graphics 530
