GRID T4-1Q vs HD Graphics 530

GRID T4-1Q

2015Core: 557 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS

HD Graphics 530

2015Core: 350 MHzBoost: 950 MHz
Similar parts
······

GRID T4-1Q vs HD Graphics 530 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID T4-1Q vs HD Graphics 530: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID T4-1Q

2015

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,880 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
  • HD Graphics 530 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GRID T4-1Q is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 1400% higher power demand at 225W vs 15W.

HD Graphics 530

2015

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 225W, a 210W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2015 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,880 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
HD Graphics 530 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.2% in PassMark G3D (3,311 vs 3,303), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GRID T4-1Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID T4-1Q makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. HD Graphics 530 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GRID T4-1Q vs HD Graphics 530 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GRID T4-1Q

The GRID T4-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,303 points.

Intel

HD Graphics 530

The HD Graphics 530 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.

Graphics Performance

The GRID T4-1Q scores 3,303 and the HD Graphics 530 reaches 3,311 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID T4-1Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the HD Graphics 530 uses Generation 9.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm+. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID T4-1Q) vs 192 (HD Graphics 530). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID T4-1Q) vs 0.3648 TFLOPS (HD Graphics 530). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 950 MHz.

FeatureGRID T4-1QHD Graphics 530
G3D Mark Score
3,303
3,311
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Generation 9.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm+
Shading Units
2048+967%
192
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.825 TFLOPS+1223%
0.3648 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1178 MHz+24%
950 MHz
ROPs
64+2033%
3
TMUs
128+433%
24

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGRID T4-1QHD Graphics 530
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID T4-1Q has 2 GB of VRAM, while the HD Graphics 530 carries 0 MB. GRID T4-1Q gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID T4-1Q and System on the HD Graphics 530.

FeatureGRID T4-1QHD Graphics 530
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Bus Width
64-bit
System
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_1 (GRID T4-1Q) vs 12 (HD Graphics 530). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.

FeatureGRID T4-1QHD Graphics 530
DirectX
12_1
12
Max Displays
0
3
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID T4-1Q draws 225W versus the HD Graphics 530's 15W — a 175% difference. The HD Graphics 530 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID T4-1Q) vs 1W (HD Graphics 530). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.

FeatureGRID T4-1QHD Graphics 530
TDP
225W
15W-93%
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Integrated
Length
1mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
14.7
220.7+1401%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID T4-1Q came in at $1880, while the HD Graphics 530 launched at $0. On MSRP, HD Graphics 530 was 100+% cheaper ($1880 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.8 (GRID T4-1Q) vs Infinity (HD Graphics 530) — the HD Graphics 530 offers Infinity% better value.

FeatureGRID T4-1QHD Graphics 530
MSRP
$1880
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
1.8
Infinity
Codename
GM204
Skylake GT2
Release
August 30 2015
September 1 2015
Ranking
#525
#887

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.