GRID T4-1Q vs P102-100

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID T4-1Q vs P102-100 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID T4-1Q vs P102-100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID T4-1Q

2015

Why buy it

✅Measures 1mm instead of 267mm, a 266mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
213.3% HIGHER MSRP
$1,880 MSRPvs$600 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.8 vs 5.5 G3D/$ ($1,880 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).

P102-100

2018

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,280 less on MSRP ($600 MSRP vs $1,880 MSRP).
✅Delivers 213.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.5 vs 1.8 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs $1,880 MSRP).
✅GRID T4-1Q is already obsolete for modern gaming, so P102-100 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌2018 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌26600% longer card at 267mm vs 1mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID T4-1Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.1% in PassMark G3D (3,303 vs 3,301), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

P102-100 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 16nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2018 generation instead of 2015. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

P102-100 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,280 cheaper on MSRP at $600 vs $1,880, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 213.1% (5.5 vs 1.8), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. GRID T4-1Q still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GRID T4-1Q vs P102-100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID T4-1Q

The GRID T4-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,303 points.

P102-100

The P102-100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 12 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1582 MHz to 1683 MHz. It has 3200 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,301 points. Launch price was $599.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID T4-1Q scores 3,303 and the P102-100 reaches 3,301 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID T4-1Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the P102-100 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID T4-1Q) vs 3,200 (P102-100). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID T4-1Q) vs 10.77 TFLOPS (P102-100). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1683 MHz.

Feature	GRID T4-1Q	P102-100
G3D Mark Score	3,303	3,301
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Pascal
Process Node	28 nm	16 nm
Shading Units	2048	3200+56%
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.825 TFLOPS	10.77 TFLOPS+123%
Boost Clock	1178 MHz	1683 MHz+43%
ROPs	64	80+25%
TMUs	128	200+56%
L1 Cache	0.75 MB	1.2 MB+60%
L2 Cache	2 MB	2.5 MB+25%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID T4-1Q	P102-100
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID T4-1Q and 64-bit on the P102-100. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID T4-1Q) vs 2.5 MB (P102-100) — the P102-100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID T4-1Q	P102-100
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	2.5 MB+25%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_1 (GRID T4-1Q) vs 12_1 (P102-100). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 0.

Feature	GRID T4-1Q	P102-100
DirectX	12_1	12_1
Max Displays	0	0

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID T4-1Q draws 225W versus the P102-100's 250W — a 10.5% difference. The GRID T4-1Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID T4-1Q) vs 350W (P102-100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.

Feature	GRID T4-1Q	P102-100
TDP	225W-10%	250W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	1mm	267mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Perf/Watt	14.7+11%	13.2

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID T4-1Q came in at $1880, while the P102-100 launched at $600. On MSRP, P102-100 was 68.1% cheaper ($1280 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.8 (GRID T4-1Q) vs 5.5 (P102-100) — the P102-100 offers 205.6% better value. The newer card here is P102-100 (2018 vs 2015).

Feature	GRID T4-1Q	P102-100
MSRP	$1880	$600-68%
Performance per Dollar	1.8	5.5+206%
Codename	GM204	GP102
Release	August 30 2015	February 12 2018
Ranking	#525	#560

Search GRID T4-1Q on Amazon

Search P102-100 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.