GeForce GTX 680M vs GRID T4-1Q

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 680M vs GRID T4-1Q FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 680M vs GRID T4-1Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 680M

2012

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Draws 100W instead of 225W, a 125W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,880 MSRP).

GRID T4-1Q

2015

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,880 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌125% higher power demand at 225W vs 100W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID T4-1Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.8% in PassMark G3D (3,303 vs 3,277), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 680M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GRID T4-1Q makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GRID T4-1Q is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 680M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 680M vs GRID T4-1Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 680M

The GeForce GTX 680M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 4 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 719 MHz to 758 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,277 points. Launch price was $310.50.

GRID T4-1Q

The GRID T4-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,303 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 680M scores 3,277 and the GRID T4-1Q reaches 3,303 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 680M is built on Kepler while the GRID T4-1Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,344 (GeForce GTX 680M) vs 2,048 (GRID T4-1Q). Raw compute: 2.038 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 680M) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID T4-1Q). Boost clocks: 758 MHz vs 1178 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 680M	GRID T4-1Q
G3D Mark Score	3,277	3,303
Architecture	Kepler	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1344	2048+52%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.038 TFLOPS	4.825 TFLOPS+137%
Boost Clock	758 MHz	1178 MHz+55%
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	112	128+14%
L1 Cache	112 KB	768 KB+586%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 680M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID T4-1Q leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 680M	GRID T4-1Q
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 680M has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GRID T4-1Q carries 2 GB. GeForce GTX 680M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 680M and 64-bit on the GRID T4-1Q. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 680M) vs 2 MB (GRID T4-1Q) — the GRID T4-1Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 680M	GRID T4-1Q
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 680M) vs 12_1 (GRID T4-1Q). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce GTX 680M	GRID T4-1Q
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12_1
Max Displays	4	0

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 680M draws 100W versus the GRID T4-1Q's 225W — a 76.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 680M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 680M) vs 350W (GRID T4-1Q). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 680M	GRID T4-1Q
TDP	100W-56%	225W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	—	1mm
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	81°C	—
Perf/Watt	32.8+123%	14.7

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GRID T4-1Q (2015 vs 2012).

Feature	GeForce GTX 680M	GRID T4-1Q
MSRP	—	$1880
Codename	GK104	GM204
Release	June 4 2012	August 30 2015
Ranking	#561	#525

Search GeForce GTX 680M on Amazon

Search GRID T4-1Q on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.