GeForce GTX 675M SLI vs GeForce GTX 680M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 675M SLI vs GeForce GTX 680M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 675M SLI vs GeForce GTX 680M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 675M SLI

2011

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 100W, a 98W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 680M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GeForce GTX 680M

2012

Why buy it

✅2.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌4900% higher power demand at 100W vs 2W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 680M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTX 675M SLI instead at 3,311 vs 3,277, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 675M SLI is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 680M makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 680M is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 675M SLI has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 675M SLI vs GeForce GTX 680M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 675M SLI

The GeForce GTX 675M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 6 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 620 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 2W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.

GeForce GTX 680M

The GeForce GTX 680M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 4 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 719 MHz to 758 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,277 points. Launch price was $310.50.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 675M SLI scores 3,311 and the GeForce GTX 680M reaches 3,277 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 675M SLI is built on Fermi while the GeForce GTX 680M uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 675M SLI) vs 1,344 (GeForce GTX 680M).

Feature	GeForce GTX 675M SLI	GeForce GTX 680M
G3D Mark Score	3,311+1%	3,277
Architecture	Fermi	Kepler
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	768	1344+75%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 675M SLI	GeForce GTX 680M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 675M SLI has 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 680M carries 4 GB. GeForce GTX 680M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 675M SLI and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 680M.

Feature	GeForce GTX 675M SLI	GeForce GTX 680M
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 675M SLI) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 680M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.0 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 675M SLI	GeForce GTX 680M
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Vulkan	1.2	1.2
OpenGL	4.0	4.6+15%
Max Displays	2	4+100%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 675M SLI) vs 1st Gen NVENC (Kepler) (GeForce GTX 680M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 675M SLI) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 680M).

Feature	GeForce GTX 675M SLI	GeForce GTX 680M
Encoder	PureVideo HD VP4	1st Gen NVENC (Kepler)
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP4	PureVideo HD VP5
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 675M SLI draws 2W versus the GeForce GTX 680M's 100W — a 192.2% difference. The GeForce GTX 675M SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 675M SLI) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 680M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 92°C vs 81°C.