GeForce GTX 485M SLI vs GeForce GTX 675M SLI

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 485M SLI

2011Core: 575 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 675M SLI

2011Core: 620 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 485M SLI

2011

Why buy it

  • 1.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • 4900% higher power demand at 100W vs 2W.

GeForce GTX 675M SLI

2011

Why buy it

  • Draws 2W instead of 100W, a 98W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 485M SLI across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 485M SLI better than GeForce GTX 675M SLI?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. GeForce GTX 485M SLI averages 1.5% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 3,360 vs 3,311 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer GeForce GTX 485M SLI is the overall package: you are getting no meaningful modern upscaling stack.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 485M SLI is the safer long-term GPU choice because it gives you the stronger overall hardware and feature outlook for modern games.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
GeForce GTX 485M SLI can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around Unknown MSRP. GeForce GTX 485M SLI is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. GeForce GTX 485M SLI is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 1.5% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 1.5% higher G3D Mark. Moving to an unclear MSRP gets you and no meaningful modern upscaling stack.
Is GeForce GTX 675M SLI still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Yes. GeForce GTX 675M SLI is still a strong gaming card in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. Price is really the swing factor here. If you find it at or below an unclear MSRP, it remains a very sensible buy. GeForce GTX 485M SLI is still the safer recommendation for most fresh builds because it offers a cleaner overall package with no meaningful modern upscaling stack.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce GTX 485M SLIGeForce GTX 675M SLI
1080p
low77 FPS77 FPS
medium64 FPS64 FPS
high49 FPS49 FPS
ultra32 FPS32 FPS
1440p
low67 FPS66 FPS
medium55 FPS54 FPS
high38 FPS38 FPS
ultra24 FPS24 FPS
4K
low24 FPS23 FPS
medium22 FPS22 FPS
high14 FPS14 FPS
ultra12 FPS12 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce GTX 485M SLIGeForce GTX 675M SLI
1080p
low67 FPS66 FPS
medium45 FPS44 FPS
high33 FPS32 FPS
ultra21 FPS20 FPS
1440p
low38 FPS37 FPS
medium21 FPS21 FPS
high15 FPS15 FPS
ultra11 FPS11 FPS
4K
low13 FPS13 FPS
medium8 FPS8 FPS
high6 FPS6 FPS
ultra5 FPS5 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce GTX 485M SLIGeForce GTX 675M SLI
1080p
low151 FPS149 FPS
medium121 FPS119 FPS
high101 FPS99 FPS
ultra76 FPS74 FPS
1440p
low113 FPS112 FPS
medium91 FPS89 FPS
high76 FPS74 FPS
ultra57 FPS56 FPS
4K
low76 FPS74 FPS
medium60 FPS60 FPS
high50 FPS50 FPS
ultra38 FPS37 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce GTX 485M SLIGeForce GTX 675M SLI
1080p
low135 FPS135 FPS
medium108 FPS107 FPS
high92 FPS89 FPS
ultra74 FPS72 FPS
1440p
low101 FPS100 FPS
medium82 FPS81 FPS
high70 FPS68 FPS
ultra56 FPS54 FPS
4K
low58 FPS58 FPS
medium45 FPS45 FPS
high36 FPS36 FPS
ultra27 FPS27 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 485M SLI and GeForce GTX 675M SLI

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 485M SLI

The GeForce GTX 485M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 6 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 575 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,360 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 675M SLI

The GeForce GTX 675M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 6 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 620 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 2W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 485M SLI scores 3,360 and the GeForce GTX 675M SLI reaches 3,311 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 485M SLI is built on Fermi while the GeForce GTX 675M SLI uses Fermi, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 485M SLI) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 675M SLI).

FeatureGeForce GTX 485M SLIGeForce GTX 675M SLI
G3D Mark Score
3,360+1%
3,311
Architecture
Fermi
Fermi
Process Node
40 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
768
768

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 485M SLIGeForce GTX 675M SLI
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureGeForce GTX 485M SLIGeForce GTX 675M SLI
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 485M SLI) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 675M SLI). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.0 vs 4.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce GTX 485M SLIGeForce GTX 675M SLI
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
OpenGL
4.0
4.0
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 485M SLI) vs PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 675M SLI). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 485M SLI) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 675M SLI).

FeatureGeForce GTX 485M SLIGeForce GTX 675M SLI
Encoder
PureVideo HD VP4
PureVideo HD VP4
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP4
PureVideo HD VP4
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 485M SLI draws 100W versus the GeForce GTX 675M SLI's 2W — a 192.2% difference. The GeForce GTX 675M SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 485M SLI) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 675M SLI). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 92°C vs 92°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 485M SLIGeForce GTX 675M SLI
TDP
100W
2W-98%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
1x 6-pin
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
92°C
92°C
Perf/Watt
33.6
1655.5+4827%