
GeForce GTX 485M SLI
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 675M SLI
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 485M SLI
2011Why buy it
- ✅1.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌4900% higher power demand at 100W vs 2W.
GeForce GTX 675M SLI
2011Why buy it
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 100W, a 98W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 485M SLI across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
GeForce GTX 485M SLI
2011GeForce GTX 675M SLI
2011Why buy it
- ✅1.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 100W, a 98W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌4900% higher power demand at 100W vs 2W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 485M SLI across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 485M SLI better than GeForce GTX 675M SLI?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 675M SLI still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 485M SLI | GeForce GTX 675M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 55 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 24 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 24 FPS | 23 FPS |
| medium | 22 FPS | 22 FPS |
| high | 14 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 12 FPS | 12 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 485M SLI | GeForce GTX 675M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 45 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 33 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 21 FPS | 20 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 38 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 21 FPS | 21 FPS |
| high | 15 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 11 FPS | 11 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 13 FPS | 13 FPS |
| medium | 8 FPS | 8 FPS |
| high | 6 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 5 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 485M SLI | GeForce GTX 675M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 113 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 76 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 37 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 485M SLI | GeForce GTX 675M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 135 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 108 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 74 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 101 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 82 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 58 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 45 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 36 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 27 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 485M SLI and GeForce GTX 675M SLI

GeForce GTX 485M SLI
GeForce GTX 485M SLI
The GeForce GTX 485M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 6 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 575 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,360 points.

GeForce GTX 675M SLI
GeForce GTX 675M SLI
The GeForce GTX 675M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 6 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 620 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 2W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 485M SLI scores 3,360 and the GeForce GTX 675M SLI reaches 3,311 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 485M SLI is built on Fermi while the GeForce GTX 675M SLI uses Fermi, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 485M SLI) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 675M SLI).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 485M SLI | GeForce GTX 675M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,360+1% | 3,311 |
| Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 768 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 485M SLI | GeForce GTX 675M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 485M SLI | GeForce GTX 675M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 485M SLI) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 675M SLI). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.0 vs 4.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 485M SLI | GeForce GTX 675M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 485M SLI) vs PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 675M SLI). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 485M SLI) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 675M SLI).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 485M SLI | GeForce GTX 675M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 485M SLI draws 100W versus the GeForce GTX 675M SLI's 2W — a 192.2% difference. The GeForce GTX 675M SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 485M SLI) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 675M SLI). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 92°C vs 92°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 485M SLI | GeForce GTX 675M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 2W-98% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 92°C | 92°C |
| Perf/Watt | 33.6 | 1655.5+4827% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












