GeForce GTX 675M SLI vs P102-100

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 675M SLI vs P102-100 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 675M SLI vs P102-100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 675M SLI

2011

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 250W, a 248W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $600 MSRP).

P102-100

2018

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅GeForce GTX 675M SLI is already obsolete for modern gaming, so P102-100 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 16nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2018 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌12400% higher power demand at 250W vs 2W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 675M SLI is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.3% in PassMark G3D (3,311 vs 3,301), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

P102-100 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 16nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2018 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

P102-100 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. GeForce GTX 675M SLI still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX 675M SLI vs P102-100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 675M SLI

The GeForce GTX 675M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 6 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 620 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 2W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.

P102-100

The P102-100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 12 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1582 MHz to 1683 MHz. It has 3200 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,301 points. Launch price was $599.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 675M SLI scores 3,311 and the P102-100 reaches 3,301 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 675M SLI is built on Fermi while the P102-100 uses Pascal, both on 40 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 675M SLI) vs 3,200 (P102-100).

Feature	GeForce GTX 675M SLI	P102-100
G3D Mark Score	3,311	3,301
Architecture	Fermi	Pascal
Process Node	40 nm	16 nm
Shading Units	768	3200+317%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 675M SLI gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The P102-100 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 675M SLI	P102-100
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 675M SLI and 64-bit on the P102-100.

Feature	GeForce GTX 675M SLI	P102-100
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 675M SLI) vs 12_1 (P102-100). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce GTX 675M SLI	P102-100
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12_1
Max Displays	2	0

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 675M SLI draws 2W versus the P102-100's 250W — a 196.8% difference. The GeForce GTX 675M SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 675M SLI) vs 350W (P102-100). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 675M SLI	P102-100
TDP	2W-99%	250W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	—	267mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	92°C	—
Perf/Watt	1655.5+12442%	13.2

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is P102-100 (2018 vs 2011).

Feature	GeForce GTX 675M SLI	P102-100
MSRP	—	$600
Codename	N12E-GTX2	GP102
Release	January 6 2011	February 12 2018
Ranking	#557	#560

Search GeForce GTX 675M SLI on Amazon

Search P102-100 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.