GeForce GTX 675M SLI
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
GeForce GTX 675M SLI vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 675M SLI vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
GeForce GTX 675M SLI vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 675M SLI
2011Why buy it
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 30W, a 28W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 33.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
2020Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅GeForce GTX 675M SLI is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅More future proof: Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) on 10nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌1400% higher power demand at 30W vs 2W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 675M SLI vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GTX 675M SLI
The GeForce GTX 675M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 6 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 620 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 2W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. It has 96 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,390 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 675M SLI scores 3,311 and the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 reaches 3,390 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 675M SLI is built on Fermi while the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 40 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 675M SLI) vs 96 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 675M SLI | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,311 | 3,390+2% |
| Architecture | Fermi | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+700% | 96 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 675M SLI gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 675M SLI | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 675M SLI and 64-bit on the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 675M SLI | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 675M SLI) vs 12.1 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.0 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 675M SLI | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.0 | 4.6+15% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 675M SLI) vs QuickSync (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 675M SLI) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,MPEG-2 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 675M SLI | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | QuickSync |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | QuickSync |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 675M SLI draws 2W versus the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7's 30W — a 175% difference. The GeForce GTX 675M SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 675M SLI) vs 350W (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 92°C vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 675M SLI | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 2W-93% | 30W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 92°C | 85-8% |
| Perf/Watt | 1655.5+1365% | 113.0 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 (2020 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 675M SLI | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $100 |
| Codename | N12E-GTX2 | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Release | January 6 2011 | August 15 2020 |
| Ranking | #557 | #508 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 675M SLI and Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
