
GeForce GTX 680M vs UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)

GeForce GTX 680M
Popular choices:

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 680M is positioned at rank 105 and the UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is on rank 37, so the UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 680M
Performance Per Dollar UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is significantly newer (2021 vs 2012). The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 680M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 680M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 680M | UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | Rocket Lake GT1 (14nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $50 (vs $50), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 1% better value per dollar than the GeForce GTX 680M.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 680M | UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1%) |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 680M and UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)

GeForce GTX 680M
The GeForce GTX 680M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 4 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 719 MHz to 758 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,277 points. Launch price was $310.50.

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2021. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 680M scores 3,277 and the UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) reaches 3,311 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680M | UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,277 | 3,311+1% |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680M | UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 680M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) has 0 MB. The GeForce GTX 680M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680M | UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 680M draws 100W versus the UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)'s 15W — a 147.8% difference. The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 680M) vs 1W (UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Integrated.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680M | UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 15W-85% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | Integrated |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 81°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 32.8 | 220.7+573% |
Value Analysis
Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 65.5 (GeForce GTX 680M) vs 66.2 (UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)) — the UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) offers 1.1% better value. The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680M | UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $50 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.5 | 66.2+1% |
| Codename | GK104 | Rocket Lake GT1 |
| Release | June 4 2012 | March 30 2021 |
| Ranking | #561 | #432 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















