GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
2011Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 25.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌278.6% higher power demand at 106W vs 28W.
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 106W, a 78W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) on 10nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2020 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 25.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 15 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 783 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 106W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,331 points.
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 96 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 28W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 scores 3,331 and the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs reaches 3,311 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 40 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 192 (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs 96 (Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs).
| Feature | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,331 | 3,311 |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 192+100% | 96 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs carries 0 MB. GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 and System on the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs 12.1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs QuickSync (Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs).
| Feature | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | QuickSync |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | QuickSync |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 draws 106W versus the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs's 28W — a 116.4% difference. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs 1W (Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 68°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 106W | 28W-74% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 210mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 68°C-20% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 31.4 | 118.3+277% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 came in at $129, while the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs launched at $0. On MSRP, Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs was 100+% cheaper ($129 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 25.8 (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs Infinity (Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs) — the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (2020 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 25.8 | Infinity |
| Codename | GF116 | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Release | March 15 2011 | August 15 2020 |
| Ranking | #739 | #536 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
