CPU
GPU
L2
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The L2 is positioned at rank #254 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar L2
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 477.6% higher G3D Mark score and 200% more VRAM (12 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the L2.
| Insight | L2 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-477.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+477.6%) |
| Longevity | Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) (5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 4nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (285mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $590 versus $1,500 for the L2, it costs 61% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 1368.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | L2 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1368.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,500) | ✅More affordable ($590) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of L2 and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
L2
The L2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 16 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1440 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 11776 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 92 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,467 points.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the L2 scores 5,467 versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 31,578 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 477.6%. The L2 is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 5 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 11,776 (L2) vs 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Raw compute: 59.35 TFLOPS (L2) vs 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Boost clocks: 2520 MHz vs 2610 MHz. Ray tracing: 92 RT cores (L2) vs 60 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) with 368 Tensor cores vs 240.
| Feature | L2 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,467 | 31,578+478% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 11776+53% | 7680 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 59.35 TFLOPS+48% | 40.09 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2520 MHz | 2610 MHz+4% |
| ROPs | 128+60% | 80 |
| TMUs | 368+53% | 240 |
| L1 Cache | 11.5 MB+53% | 7.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+100% | 48 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 92+53% | 60 |
| Tensor Cores | 368+53% | 240 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The L2 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | L2 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The L2 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 96 MB (L2) vs 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the L2 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | L2 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 12 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+100% | 48 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_2 (L2) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | L2 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_2 | 12 Ultimate |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th Gen (L2) vs NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1 (L2) vs AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti).
| Feature | L2 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th Gen | NVENC (8th Gen) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | NVDEC (5th Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,AV1 | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The L2 draws 275W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 285W — a 3.6% difference. The L2 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (L2) vs 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 168mm vs 285mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | L2 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 275W-4% | 285W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-50% | 700W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 168mm | 285mm |
| Height | 69mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 19.9 | 110.8+457% |
Value Analysis
The L2 launched at $2000 MSRP and currently averages $1500, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 and now averages $590. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti costs 60.7% less ($910 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 3.6 (L2) vs 53.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 1386.1% better value.
| Feature | L2 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2000 | $799-60% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1500 | $590-61% |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.6 | 53.5+1386% |
| Codename | AD102 | AD104 |
| Release | November 16 2023 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #189 | #11 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on L2 and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
