L2 vs GeForce GTX 1650

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The L2 is positioned at rank #254 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar L2

#106

L40S

MSRP: $7500|Avg: $7500

98%

#107

Quadro P6000

MSRP: $5999|Avg: $1500

95%

#239

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

5411%

#254

L2

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $1500

100%

#255

FirePro W8100

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $200

100%

#256

Quadro K5200

MSRP: $2250|Avg: $70

100%

#258

Quadro K2000D

MSRP: $599|Avg: $35

98%

#259

FirePro V7800

MSRP: $759|Avg: $96

98%

#260

FirePro W8000

MSRP: $1599|Avg: $1599

97%

#261

Quadro K2000

MSRP: $599|Avg: $500

97%

#262

GRID P4-8Q

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $200

97%

#264

FirePro 3D V5800

MSRP: $479|Avg: $30

94%

#265

GRID M40

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $100

92%

#266

GRID P40-8Q

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150

92%

#267

GRID M3-3020

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $50

92%

#268

FirePro V3800

MSRP: $129|Avg: $12

91%

#269

FirePro V5800

MSRP: $479|Avg: $15

90%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 43.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the L2.

Insight	L2	GeForce GTX 1650
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-43.9%)	✅Leading raw performance (+43.9%)
Longevity	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) (5nm)	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $1,500 for the L2, it costs 95% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 2778.7% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	L2	GeForce GTX 1650
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+2778.7%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,500)	✅More affordable ($75)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

L2 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of L2 and GeForce GTX 1650

L2

The L2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 16 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1440 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 11776 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 92 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,467 points.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the L2 scores 5,467 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 43.9%. The L2 is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 11,776 (L2) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 59.35 TFLOPS (L2) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 2520 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

Feature	L2	GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score	5,467	7,869+44%
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Turing
Process Node	5 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	11776+1214%	896
Compute (TFLOPS)	59.35 TFLOPS+1889%	2.984 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2520 MHz+51%	1665 MHz
ROPs	128+300%	32
TMUs	368+557%	56
L1 Cache	11.5 MB+1207%	0.88 MB
L2 Cache	96 MB+9500%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	L2	GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 96 MB (L2) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the L2 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	L2	GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	96 MB+9500%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_2 (L2) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.

Feature	L2	GeForce GTX 1650
DirectX	12_2	12
Max Displays	0	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th Gen (L2) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1 (L2) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).

Feature	L2	GeForce GTX 1650
Encoder	NVENC 8th Gen	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder	NVDEC 5th Gen	NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs	H.264,H.265,AV1	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The L2 draws 275W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 114.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (L2) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 168mm vs 229mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.

Feature	L2	GeForce GTX 1650
TDP	275W	75W-73%
Recommended PSU	350W	300W-14%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	168mm	229mm
Height	69mm	111mm
Slots	1-50%	2
Temp (Load)	—	70°C
Perf/Watt	19.9	104.9+427%

💰

Value Analysis

The L2 launched at $2000 MSRP and currently averages $1500, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 95% less ($1425 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 3.6 (L2) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 2813.9% better value. The L2 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).