
L4

RTX A1000
L4 vs RTX A1000 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
L4 vs RTX A1000 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
L4 vs RTX A1000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
L4
2023Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌213.1% HIGHER MSRP$2,345 MSRPvs$749 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.3 vs 14.4 G3D/$ ($2,345 MSRP vs $749 MSRP).
- ❌44% higher power demand at 72W vs 50W.
RTX A1000
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,596 less on MSRP ($749 MSRP vs $2,345 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 233.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.4 vs 4.3 G3D/$ ($749 MSRP vs $2,345 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 72W, a 22W reduction.
- ✅Measures 163mm instead of 169mm, a 6mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
L4 vs RTX A1000 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

L4
The L4 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 795 MHz to 2040 MHz. It has 7424 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 72W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,153 points.

RTX A1000
The RTX A1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 16 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 727 MHz to 1462 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,814 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the L4 scores 10,153 versus the RTX A1000's 10,814 — the RTX A1000 leads by 6.5%. The L4 is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX A1000 uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 7,424 (L4) vs 2,304 (RTX A1000). Raw compute: 30.29 TFLOPS (L4) vs 6.737 TFLOPS (RTX A1000). Boost clocks: 2040 MHz vs 1462 MHz. Ray tracing: 60 RT cores (L4) vs 18 (RTX A1000) with 240 Tensor cores vs 72.
| Feature | L4 | RTX A1000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,153 | 10,814+7% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 7424+222% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 30.29 TFLOPS+350% | 6.737 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2040 MHz+40% | 1462 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+150% | 32 |
| TMUs | 240+233% | 72 |
| L1 Cache | 7.5 MB+226% | 2.3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+2300% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 60+233% | 18 |
| Tensor Cores | 240+233% | 72 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX A1000 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The L4 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | L4 | RTX A1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the L4 and 128-bit on the RTX A1000. L2 Cache: 48 MB (L4) vs 2 MB (RTX A1000) — the L4 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | L4 | RTX A1000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+2300% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (L4) vs 12.2 (RTX A1000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | L4 | RTX A1000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (L4) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A1000). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC (4x) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (L4) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A1000).
| Feature | L4 | RTX A1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC (4x) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The L4 draws 72W versus the RTX A1000's 50W — a 36.1% difference. The RTX A1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (L4) vs 500W (RTX A1000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 169mm vs 163mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | L4 | RTX A1000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 72W | 50W-31% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 169mm | 163mm |
| Height | 69mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 141.0 | 216.3+53% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the L4 came in at $2345, while the RTX A1000 launched at $749. On MSRP, RTX A1000 was 68.1% cheaper ($1596 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.3 (L4) vs 14.4 (RTX A1000) — the RTX A1000 offers 234.9% better value. The newer card here is RTX A1000 (2024 vs 2023).
| Feature | L4 | RTX A1000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2345 | $749-68% |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.3 | 14.4+235% |
| Codename | AD104 | GA107 |
| Release | March 21 2023 | April 16 2024 |
| Ranking | #259 | #251 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













