CPU
GPU
L40S
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar L40S
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3070
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 10.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the L40S offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | L40S | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-10.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+10.7%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace / 5nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (48 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $200 versus $7,500 for the L40S, it costs 97% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 4052.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | L40S | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+4052.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($7,500) | ✅More affordable ($200) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of L40S and GeForce RTX 3070
L40S
The L40S is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 13 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1110 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 18176 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 142 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,023 points.
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the L40S scores 20,023 versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 22,172 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 10.7%. The L40S is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce RTX 3070 uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 18,176 (L40S) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070). Raw compute: 91.61 TFLOPS (L40S) vs 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070). Boost clocks: 2520 MHz vs 1725 MHz. Ray tracing: 142 RT cores (L40S) vs 46 (GeForce RTX 3070) with 568 Tensor cores vs 184.
| Feature | L40S | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,023 | 22,172+11% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 18176+209% | 5888 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 91.61 TFLOPS+351% | 20.31 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2520 MHz+46% | 1725 MHz |
| ROPs | 192+100% | 96 |
| TMUs | 568+209% | 184 |
| L1 Cache | 17.8 MB+207% | 5.8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+1100% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 142+209% | 46 |
| Tensor Cores | 568+209% | 184 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | L40S | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The L40S comes with 48 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3070 has 8 GB. The L40S offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 960 GB/s (L40S) vs 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070) — a 114.3% advantage for the L40S. Bus width: 384-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (L40S) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) — the L40S has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | L40S | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 48 GB+500% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 960 GB/s+114% | 448 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+1100% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (L40S) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | L40S | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th Gen (L40S) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1 (L40S) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070).
| Feature | L40S | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th Gen | NVENC 7th gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,AV1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The L40S draws 300W versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 220W — a 30.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 3070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 800W (L40S) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 3070). Power connectors: 16-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 242mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | L40S | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 220W-27% |
| Recommended PSU | 800W | 650W-19% |
| Power Connector | 16-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 242mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 66.7 | 100.8+51% |
Value Analysis
The L40S launched at $7500 MSRP and currently averages $7500, while the GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 and now averages $200. The GeForce RTX 3070 costs 97.3% less ($7300 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.7 (L40S) vs 110.9 (GeForce RTX 3070) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 4007.4% better value. The L40S is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2020).
| Feature | L40S | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $7500 | $499-93% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $7500 | $200-97% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.7 | 110.9+4007% |
| Codename | AD102 | GA104 |
| Release | October 13 2022 | September 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #76 | #63 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on L40S and GeForce RTX 3070
