
M1 Pro 8-Core

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
M1 Pro 8-Core vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
M1 Pro 8-Core vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
M1 Pro 8-Core vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
M1 Pro 8-Core
2021Why buy it
- ✅+1.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 105W, a 77W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on none with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Apple M1 Pro GPU (14-core), while Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X.
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Prism), unlike M1 Pro 8-Core.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,959 vs 17,218).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while M1 Pro 8-Core mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌275% higher power demand at 105W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while M1 Pro 8-Core moves to none and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while M1 Pro 8-Core can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is M1 Pro 8-Core better than Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
M1 Pro 8-Core vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
M1 Pro 8-Core
The M1 Pro 8-Core is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 18 October 2021 (4 years ago). It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.06 GHz, with boost up to 3.22 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 28 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 17,218 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
The Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 September 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 16,959 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The M1 Pro 8-Core packs 8 cores / 8 threads, matching the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X's 8 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.22 GHz on the M1 Pro 8-Core versus 4.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X — a 24% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X (base: 2.06 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X is built on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. In PassMark, the M1 Pro 8-Core scores 17,218 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X's 16,959 — a 1.5% lead for the M1 Pro 8-Core. L3 cache: 16 MB on the M1 Pro 8-Core vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X.
| Feature | M1 Pro 8-Core | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 3.22 GHz | 4.1 GHz+27% |
| Base Clock | 2.06 GHz | 3.6 GHz+75% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 28 MB | 512K (per core)+1729% |
| Process | 5 nm-58% | 12 nm |
| Architecture | — | Zen+ (2018−2019) |
| PassMark | 17,218+2% | 16,959 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 9,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,255 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 6,243 |
Memory & Platform
The M1 Pro 8-Core uses the none socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR5-6400 on the M1 Pro 8-Core versus DDR4-2933 on the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X — the M1 Pro 8-Core supports 118.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (M1 Pro 8-Core) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X). PCIe lanes: 0 (M1 Pro 8-Core) vs 20 (Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X) — the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | M1 Pro 8-Core | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | none | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5-6400+118% | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | 128 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 4+100% | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: Virtualization (M1 Pro 8-Core) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X). The M1 Pro 8-Core includes integrated graphics (Apple M1 Pro GPU (14-core)), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: M1 Pro 8-Core targets Mobile, Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X targets Workstation.
| Feature | M1 Pro 8-Core | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Apple M1 Pro GPU (14-core) | — |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | Virtualization | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Mobile | Workstation |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












