M1 Pro 8-Core vs Xeon E5-2683 v4

M1 Pro 8-Core

8 Cores8 Thrd28 WWMax: 3.22 GHz2021

Xeon E5-2683 v4

16 Cores32 Thrd120 WWMax: 3 GHz2016

Performance Spectrum - CPU

M1 Pro 8-Core

8 / 8

17,218

0.0%

Xeon E5-2683 v4

16 / 32

17,459

+1.4%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar M1 Pro 8-Core

#208

M1 Pro 8-Core

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2683 v4

#106

Xeon Gold 6143

MSRP: $342|Avg: $342

104%

#115

Xeon W-1370

MSRP: $323|Avg: $323

102%

#119

Xeon 6505P

MSRP: $563|Avg: $563

100%

#121

Xeon E5-2683 v4

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#130

EPYC 9115

MSRP: $726|Avg: $726

95%

#131

EPYC 74F3

MSRP: $913|Avg: $824

95%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The M1 Pro 8-Core (2021) utilizes 5 nm technology and LPDDR5, providing a fundamental performance advantage.

Insight	M1 Pro 8-Core	Xeon E5-2683 v4
Gaming	✅ Superior gaming performance	❌ Lower gaming performance
Workstation	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks	✅ Better multi-core power
Price	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing
Longevity	✨ Modern (Legacy / 5 nm)	🛑 Legacy (Broadwell (2015−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon E5-2683 v4 (2016) relies on 14 nm technology and DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.

Insight	M1 Pro 8-Core	Xeon E5-2683 v4
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

M1 Pro 8-Core Benchmark Check

Xeon E5-2683 v4 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of M1 Pro 8-Core and Xeon E5-2683 v4

M1 Pro 8-Core

The M1 Pro 8-Core is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 18 October 2021 (4 years ago). It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.06 GHz, with boost up to 3.22 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 28 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 17,218 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-2683 v4

The Xeon E5-2683 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 40 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 17,459 points. Launch price was $1,846.

⚡

Processing Power

The M1 Pro 8-Core packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2683 v4 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon E5-2683 v4 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.22 GHz on the M1 Pro 8-Core versus 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2683 v4 — a 7.1% clock advantage for the M1 Pro 8-Core (base: 2.06 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Xeon E5-2683 v4 is built on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. In PassMark, the M1 Pro 8-Core scores 17,218 against the Xeon E5-2683 v4's 17,459 — a 1.4% lead for the Xeon E5-2683 v4. L3 cache: 16 MB on the M1 Pro 8-Core vs 40 MB on the Xeon E5-2683 v4.

Feature	M1 Pro 8-Core	Xeon E5-2683 v4
Cores / Threads	8 / 8	16 / 32+100%
Boost Clock	3.22 GHz+7%	3 GHz
Base Clock	2.06 GHz	2.1 GHz+2%
L3 Cache	16 MB	40 MB+150%
L2 Cache	28 MB+600%	4 MB
Process	5 nm-64%	14 nm
Architecture	—	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	17,218	17,459+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The M1 Pro 8-Core uses the none socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2683 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR5-6400 on the M1 Pro 8-Core versus DDR4-2400 on the Xeon E5-2683 v4 — the M1 Pro 8-Core supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2683 v4 supports up to 1536 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 191.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 4-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (M1 Pro 8-Core) vs 40 (Xeon E5-2683 v4) — the Xeon E5-2683 v4 offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	M1 Pro 8-Core	Xeon E5-2683 v4
Socket	none	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR5-6400+25%	DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	1536 GB+4700%
RAM Channels	4	4
ECC Support	❌	✅
PCIe Lanes	0	40

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Virtualization (M1 Pro 8-Core) / not specified (Xeon E5-2683 v4). The M1 Pro 8-Core includes integrated graphics (Apple M1 Pro GPU (14-core)), while the Xeon E5-2683 v4 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: M1 Pro 8-Core targets Mobile.